Published June 2021
| Version v1
Journal article
How do patient-reported outcomes compare with clinician assessments? A prospective study of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer
Creators
- 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto (Canada)
- 2. MacroStat Inc., Toronto (Canada)
Description
Highlights: • Patient- and clinician-reported outcomes consistently demonstrated low agreement. • Clinicians significantly underreported all symptoms in relation to patients. • Use of patient-reported outcomes in routine practice may improve symptom management. • A new tool is needed to score symptoms from the patient and clinician perspectives. Breast cancer patients frequently develop radiation dermatitis (RD) when undergoing post-operative radiation therapy (RT). Traditional RD assessment methods measure clinician-reported outcomes (CROs), but patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have gained recent popularity. The purpose of this prospective analysis was to compare PROs with CROs of breast RD.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.020Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.020;
- PII
- S0167814021061466;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiotherapy and Oncology
- Journal Volume
- 159
- Journal Page Range
- p. 98-105
- ISSN
- 0167-8140
- CODEN
- RAONDT
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54013818
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- DERMATITIS; MAMMARY GLANDS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; SYMPTOMS
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DISEASES; GLANDS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; SKIN DISEASES; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.