Published January 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Numerical investigations of an opposed rotary piston expander for the purpose of the applications to a small-scale Rankine cycle

  • 1. Mechanical Engineering Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey GU2 7XH (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT (United Kingdom)
  • 3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 (China)
  • 4. School of Vocational and Technical, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024 (China)
  • 5. Enigma England Ltd, Kent ME19 5NX (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • This opposed rotary piston expander has a cyclic period of 180° crank angle. • In-cylinder pressure reaches peak value in a short period after intake ports opens. • Bowls in the pistons significantly enlarge the duration of intake process. • Volumetric efficiency shows a higher dependence on speeds than intake pressure. Requirements of recycling low temperature waste heat energy from internal combustion engines drive the developments of excellent performance expanders with high compactness which significantly affects the applications of waste heat recovery systems to on-road vehicles. In the present study, an opposed rotary piston expander was proposed for the practical utilisations on a small-scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) system, aiming at recycling the waste heat energy from internal combustion engines of on-road vehicles. The opposed rotary piston expander had a cyclic period of 180° crank angle (CA), four intake ports and two discharge ports. In order to investigate the expander performance, 3D numerical simulations were conducted under various scenarios whose boundary conditions were among the frequently reported thermodynamic states in ORC systems; additionally, these scenarios were around the design operation point of the expander. Intake and discharge characteristics, in-cylinder pressure evolutions, in-cylinder fluid flow, and P-V diagrams were analysed; further, volumetric efficiency, power output and adiabatic efficiency were calculated using the simulation results, and were compared to various types of expanders. Each two opposed cylinders had the same evolutions of cylinder volume, fluid mass, in-cylinder pressure, and temperature during operation. Maximum fluid flow rate in the intake process increased with intake pressure and rotation speed; in addition, the in-cylinder pressure reached the maximum value in a short time after the intake ports opened. However, high rotation speed also led to a drop of in-cylinder pressure (expansion process), volumetric efficiency, and adiabatic efficiency compared to low speed condition.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116157

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116157;
PII
S1359431120336371;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Thermal Engineering
Journal Volume
182
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
1359-4311
CODEN
ATENFT

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.