The Ambivalent Role of Participants in Nuclear Waste Decisions - 16360

Today's global nuclear sector has entered a critical juncture. Waste management solutions have the potential to influence the prospects of whether new plants will be built and when aging plants will be decommissioned. Even in countries without nuclear power plants, the siting of nuclear waste can present communication challenges and opportunities for public involvement. As new nuclear programs withstand scrutiny, local communities share their want for solutions to nuclear waste before new plant construction commences. Developing nations have begun to explore the potential of adding nuclear power production to their energy mix. They carefully watch established nuclear players to accelerate their plans with lessons learned elsewhere. Some newcomers to nuclear energy will make decisions on new construction based on other operators' abilities to reconcile public concerns regarding radioactive waste. Distinct forms of government, cultural norms and means of public discourse present innovative approaches and changing expectations worldwide. This paper explores how practitioners are evaluating ways to activate stakeholders on nuclear waste siting in nations embarking on new nuclear programs. It investigates the incentives that people have to participate and legitimize the formation of laws, regulations and standards for nuclear materials management. Finally, it highlights examples of public participation techniques from established operating environments and posits that overly prescriptive requirements for stakeholder engagement can reduce the authenticity of public involvement and weaken confidence among participants in the decision making process. (authors)