Published September 1983
| Version v1
Report
A comparison between the canister method and the ROAC system for radon emanation rate measurements
Creators
Description
Two methods for measuring radon emanation rates which rely on the adsorption of radon onto activated charcoal and subsequent gamma counting were compared. The ROACs were found to measure 38% of the values obtained by the charcoal canisters. This was probably due to radon loss arising from poor seals at the ground-air interface. The difference in sampling efficiency was determined to be about 10-15%
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Title
- Annual review of research projects 1982
- Imprint Pagination
- 137 p.
- Journal Page Range
- p. 19-21.
- Report number
- ARL/TR--060
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Australia
- Country of Input or Organization
- Australia
- INIS RN
- 15044419
- Subject category
- S46: INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACTIVATED CARBON; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; EMANOMETERS; RADON; RADON 222
- Descriptors DEC
- ADSORBENTS; ALPHA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; CARBON; DAYS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES; ELEMENTS; EVEN-EVEN NUCLEI; HEAVY NUCLEI; ISOTOPES; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; NONMETALS; NUCLEI; RADIATION DETECTORS; RADIOISOTOPES; RADON ISOTOPES; RARE GASES