Published March 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison between 18F-NaF PET and PET-CT to detect bone metastases in patients with lung cancer

  • 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hosptial, Tianjin (China)
  • 2. PET-CT Center, General Hosptial of Tianjin Medical Univ., Tianjin (China)

Description

Objective: To evaluate the effect of 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer. Methods: Thirty-four patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer were performed with 18F-NaF PET-CT. 18F-NaF PET and 18F-NaF PET-CT were interpreted separately. Lesions were categorized as malignant, benign or inconclusive. A panel of reference methods was used, including MRI (34 patients), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT (4 patients), histopathology (2 patients), or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months (6 patients). Results: In patient-based analysis, 11 of 34 patients had bone metastases. 18F-NaF PET-CT correctly diagnosed all 11 patients with bone metastases, 18F-NaF PET only correctly detected 8 of them. 18F-NaF PET-CT had no false and inconclusive diagnosis. In lesion-based analysis, 118 lesions were assessed which had final diagnosis (47 metastases, 71 benign lesions). 18F-NaF PET-CT was correct in 46 metastatic lesions and 71 benign lesions, but false-negative in lesion. 18F-NaF PET was correct in 27 metastatic lesions and 64 benign lesions, but wrong in 3 lesions (2 benign lesions, 1 metastatic lesions), and equivocal in 24 lesions. Based on the corresponding appearance on low-dose CT, 46 of 47 lesions were categorized metastases (31 presented as sites of increased uptake with corresponding lytic or sclerotic changes, and other 15 metastases show normal or non-specific appearing bone), only 1 sclerotic metastasis was judged benign. All 71 benign lesions have a benign appearance on low-dose CT. In patient- based analysis, categorizing equivocal and malignant interpretation as suggestive for malignancy, the 18F-NaF PET-CT was more specific than 18F-NaF PET (100% vs 78%, χ2=10.78, P<0.05), the sensitivity was 100% for each other. Categorizing equivocal and benign as benignity, the 18F PET-CT was more sensitive than 18F-NaF PET (100% vs 73%, 22=6.41, P<0.001), the specificity between them was not significantly (100% vs 96%, χ2=2.03, P>0.05 ). In lesion-based analysis, the similar results were obtained as patient-based analysis. Conclusion: 18F-NaF PET-CT was both sensitive and specific for detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. With the diagnosis information of low-dose CT, its ability of differentiation between malignant and benign lesions is improved. (authors)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine
Journal Volume
33
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 68-72
ISSN
1673-4114

Optional Information

Notes
3 figs., 2 tabs., 13 refs.