Published May 1983 | Version v1
Report Restricted

Evaluation of a remote continual verification system, RECOVER, for International Safeguards. Final report

Description

The potential role of a remote continual verification system (RECOVER) has been evaluated for a number of major fuel-cycle facility types. Those considered were light-water reactors, pressurized heavy-water power reactors (specifically, CANDU-600's), fast critical facilities (modelled after the Japanese facility, FCA), mixed-oxide fuel-fabrication plants, spent-fuel reprocessing plants, and inactive stores of plutonium or highly-enriched uranium. Most of the analysis was limited to those factors that could be expressed quantitatively, such as costs and savings. The limitation of such a narrow focus is that it tends to slight or ignore certain important non-quantifiable considerations, such as those noted below in connection with the conclusions for light water reactors. The relative weight to be given to these factors, compared with the quantifiable ones, is a matter of judgment for the International Atomic Energy Agency, and was not considered in the study. 11 figs., 14 tabs

Availability note (English)

MF available from INIS under the Report Number; Available from NTIS, PC A07/MF A01; 1 as DE86011523.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
141 p.
Report number
ISPO--198

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
18003037
Subject category
S98: NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CONTAINMENT; COST; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; IAEA SAFEGUARDS; MONITORING; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; VERIFICATION
Descriptors DEC
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; SAFEGUARDS

Optional Information

Notes
Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products.