Published October 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Effect of implementing building energy efficiency labeling in China: A case study in Shanghai

  • 1. National Engineering Laboratory for Digital Construction and Evaluation Technology of Urban Rail Transit, Tianjin, 300072 (China)
  • 2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350 (China)
  • 3. Center of Science and Technology and Industrialization Development, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing, 100835 (China)
  • 4. The Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, University College London (UCL), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • The effect of implementing the BEEL scheme in Shanghai was investigated through statistical method. • The relationship between energy use intensity and energy-saving rate was analyzed. • Suitable energy-efficient technologies were recommended based on local conditions and requirements. • Barriers of using the BEEL scheme in whole China were analyzed, with corresponding solutions. -- Abstract: The building energy efficiency labeling (BEEL) scheme has been adopted in China since 2008. However, until now, its effect on the actual building energy efficiency has not been accurately established. The objective of this study was to investigate this effect through a case study in Shanghai, China. Additionally, by performing a thorough review, potential barriers for implementing the BEEL scheme in major areas of China were analyzed. The results indicated that 1) the energy use intensity of labeled commercial office buildings in Shanghai followed a normal distribution, with an average value of 79.14 kWh/(m2a); 2) the energy-saving rate and energy consumption exhibited an inversely proportional relationship for residential buildings, but this relationship was not applicable for commercial office buildings; 3) for Shanghai, ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) and variable refrigerant volume systems are more appropriate for commercial office buildings, and GSHPs and split air conditioners are more useful for residential buildings. The potential barriers were classified into three main categories—technical, political, and awareness—and corresponding solutions were proposed. The authors hope that this study can promote the adoption of the BEEL scheme in China.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110898;
PII
S0301421519304768;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
133
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55007585
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AIR CONDITIONERS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Descriptors DEC
BUILDINGS; ECONOMICS; EFFICIENCY; HEAT PUMPS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.