Published May 2005 | Version v1
Journal article

Opinions of the well-informed persons about the nuclear reactor facility periodical inspection

  • 1. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Tokyo (Japan)
  • 2. Japan Nuclear Technology Inst., Tokyo (Japan)
  • 3. Japan Electric Power Information Center, Inc., Tokyo (Japan)
  • 4. RIKEN, Yokohama Inst., Yokohama, Kanagawa (Japan)

Description

Falsifications of self-inspection records in the shrouds and of leakage rates for containment vessels at TEPCO nuclear power plants destroyed public trust in nuclear safety. The Nuclear Reactor Regulation Law and Electric Utility Law were amended to enhance the nuclear safety regulation system. The major improvements are that operators are legally required to conduct inspection (periodical operator inspection) and recording and keeping inspection results. The operator performs 'periodical operator inspection' regularly, and Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) performs periodical inspection' about particularly important facilities/function in safety. Sixteen opinions of well-informed persons about the nuclear reactor facility periodical inspection were presented in this special number. Interval of periodical inspection less than thirteen months was disputed. Maintenance activities should be more rationalized based on risk information. (T. Tanaka)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Enerugi Seisaku Kenkyu
Journal Issue
special issue 2
Journal Page Range
p. 1-64
CODEN
ESKNAN