Opinions of the well-informed persons about the nuclear reactor facility periodical inspection
- 1. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Tokyo (Japan)
- 2. Japan Nuclear Technology Inst., Tokyo (Japan)
- 3. Japan Electric Power Information Center, Inc., Tokyo (Japan)
- 4. RIKEN, Yokohama Inst., Yokohama, Kanagawa (Japan)
Description
Falsifications of self-inspection records in the shrouds and of leakage rates for containment vessels at TEPCO nuclear power plants destroyed public trust in nuclear safety. The Nuclear Reactor Regulation Law and Electric Utility Law were amended to enhance the nuclear safety regulation system. The major improvements are that operators are legally required to conduct inspection (periodical operator inspection) and recording and keeping inspection results. The operator performs 'periodical operator inspection' regularly, and Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) performs periodical inspection' about particularly important facilities/function in safety. Sixteen opinions of well-informed persons about the nuclear reactor facility periodical inspection were presented in this special number. Interval of periodical inspection less than thirteen months was disputed. Maintenance activities should be more rationalized based on risk information. (T. Tanaka)
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Enerugi Seisaku Kenkyu
- Journal Issue
- special issue 2
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1-64
- CODEN
- ESKNAN
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Japan
- Country of Input or Organization
- Japan
- INIS RN
- 40024870
- Subject category
- S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
- Descriptors DEI
- IN-SERVICE INSPECTION; LEAK TESTING; NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; REACTOR MAINTENANCE; REACTOR SAFETY; REGULATIONS; RELIABILITY; REPAIR
- Descriptors DEC
- INSPECTION; LAWS; MAINTENANCE; MATERIALS TESTING; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; SAFETY; TESTING; THERMAL POWER PLANTS