Published May 3, 2018 | Version v1
Report

The Role of Statistical Noise in Edge Plasma Transport Codes Based on Kinetic Monte Carlo Solvers for Neutrals: an Analogy with Turbulent Fluctuations

  • 1. Physique des Interactions Ioniques et Moléculaires (PIIM), CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université (France)
  • 2. Institut de Recherche sur la Fusion par confinement Magnétique (IRFM), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique (CEA/Cadarache), 13108 Saint-Paul-lès-Durance (France)
  • 3. Laboratoire de Mécanique, Modélisation & Procédés Propres (M2P2), Aix-Marseille Université (France)

Description

Full text: Power exhaust is one of the major challenges that future devices such as ITER and DEMO will face. Because of the lack of identified scaling parameters, predictions for divertor plasma conditions in these devices have to rely on detailed modelling. Most plasma edge simulations carried out so far rely on transport codes, which consist of a fluid code for the plasma coupled to a kinetic Monte Carlo (MC) code for neutral particles (atoms, molecules). An example of such tools is the Soledge2D-EIRENE code developed by our team. One of the main difficulties in interpreting code results is the lack of a proper convergence criterion for the simulations, because of the statistical noise originating in the kinetic MC calculation. Here, we take a new look at these noise related issues. We argue that these two problems share strong similarities, and that what is usually referred to as the steady state reached by a transport code after convergence bears strong resemblance with the statistically stationary state (SSS) reached by a turbulence code. We argue, by analogy with turbulence related studies, that the proper choice for the solution of coupled fluid-kinetic Monte Carlo simulations is the time average of the SSS. In most of the cases, this quantity is time independent, and is solution of a well-defined set of equations. The latter exhibits additional terms compared to the initial system, originating from its parametric and/or statistical nonlinearities. The additional terms can be calculated from the SSS, and provide a physical picture of the effects of the noise. Numerical results show that if the spatial structure of the noise is frozen long enough for the plasma to adjust, then the mean solution can differ markedly from the noise free solution. We present cases for which noise leads to a lower recycling divertor. Nevertheless, the mean particle balance is satisfied even in those cases, highlighting the need to monitor the effects of noise closely, because usual sanity checks on the solution might not fail even in cases where the solution is strongly affected. The relative importance of the various noise-induced terms is discussed, in order to explain the mechanisms through which noise can push the mean solution towards less recycling conditions, at least in the simulations presented here. (author)

Part of:
26. IAEA Fusion Energy Conference. Programme, Abstracts and Conference Material

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Title
26. IAEA Fusion Energy Conference. Programme, Abstracts and Conference Material
Imprint Pagination
935 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 628
Report number
IAEA-CN--234

Conference

Title
26. IAEA Fusion Energy Conference
Acronym
FEC 2016
Dates
17-22 Oct 2016
Place
Kyoto (Japan)

INIS

Country of Publication
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
50008499
Subject category
S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DIVERTORS; ITER TOKAMAK; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PLASMA
Descriptors DEC
CALCULATION METHODS; CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; SIMULATION; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS; TOKAMAK DEVICES; TOKAMAK TYPE REACTORS

Optional Information

Notes
Abstract only
Secondary number(s)
IAEA-CN--234-0180