Published September 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: Evidence from China

  • 1. Department of Building, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 4 Architecture Drive, Singapore S117566 (Singapore)
  • 2. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 (China)
  • 3. Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental Management, Beijing 100081 (China)
  • 4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in Beijing, Beijing 100081 (China)
  • 5. Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, Beijing 100081 (China)
  • 6. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 (China)
  • 7. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, NH 03824 (United States)

Description

Fixed asset investment (FAI) and foreign indirect investment (FDI) have important influences on economic development and environmental quality. Because environmental performance is related with economic development, FAI and FDI may affect environment indirectly through their impacts on economic growth. In this study, the direct and indirect effects of both FAI and FDI on China's environmental quality are distinguished and separately estimated for the first time with a carefully designed framework of a two-equation model. Because most economic activities and environmental pollutions occur in the urban areas, a panel data of 112 Chinese cities for the period 2002–2015 is utilized. Several spatial factors are also introduced to control for the potential spatial correlations in economic development and pollutant emissions. The estimation results indicate that there exist apparent differences in the environmental effects of FAI and FDI. The direct effects of FAI on SO2 emissions are significant positive and dominate the negative indirect effects. By contrast, the direct, indirect and total effects of FDI on pollutant emissions are all negative. Therefore, overall speaking, well designed and targeted policies should be formulated to reduce the negative environmental impacts of FAI and to increase the positive influences of FDI on environment. - Highlights: • Influences of domestic and foreign investment on environmental quality in China are investigated. • City-level panel data of fixed asset investment (FAI) and foreign direct investment (FDI) are used. • Spatial correlations in economic development and pollutant emissions are controlled for. • The positive direct effects of FAI on SO2 emissions dominate the negative indirect effects. • The direct, indirect and total effects of FDI on both pollutant emissions are all negative.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.055

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.055;
PII
S0301-4215(17)30346-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
108
Journal Page Range
p. 271-280
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49057345
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Numerical Data
Descriptors DEI
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; AIR POLLUTION MONITORING; CHINA; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; FINANCIAL DATA; INVESTMENT; POLLUTANTS; SULFUR DIOXIDE; URBAN AREAS
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; CHALCOGENIDES; CONTROL; DATA; INFORMATION; MONITORING; NUMERICAL DATA; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; POLLUTION CONTROL; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; SULFUR OXIDES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.