Published February 1, 2010 | Version v1
Journal article

Natural History of Clinically Staged Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Monotherapeutic Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)
  • 2. Schiffler Cancer Center and Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV (United States)
  • 3. Puget Sound Healthcare Corporation, Group Health Cooperative, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)

Description

Purpose: To evaluate the natural history of clinically staged low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial seed implants as monotherapy. Methods and Materials: Between April 1995 and May 2005, 463 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent brachytherapy as the sole definitive treatment. Men who received supplemental external beam radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy were excluded. Dosimetric implant quality was determined based on the minimum dose that covered 90% of the target volume and the volume of the prostate gland receiving 100% of the prescribed dose. Multiple parameters were evaluated as predictors of treatment outcomes. Results: The 12-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), cause-specific survival, and overall survival rates for the entire cohort were 97.1%, 99.7%, and 75.4%, respectively. Only pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, percent positive biopsy cores, and minimum dose that covered 90% of the target volume were significant predictors of biochemical recurrence. The bPFS, cause-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 97.4%, 99.6%, and 76.2%, respectively, for low-risk patients and 96.4%, 100%, and 74.0%, respectively, for intermediate-risk patients. The bPFS rate was 98.8% for low-risk patients with high-quality implants versus 92.1% for those with less adequate implants (p < 0.01), and it was 98.3% for intermediate-risk patients with high-quality implants versus 86.4% for those with less adequate implants (p < 0.01). Conclusions: High-quality brachytherapy implants as monotherapy can provide excellent outcomes for men with clinically staged low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. For these men, a high-quality implant can achieve results comparable to high-quality surgery in the most favorable pathologically staged patient subgroups.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.021

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.021;
PII
S0360-3016(09)00258-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
76
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 349-354
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
41102499
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BRACHYTHERAPY; IMPLANTS; INTERSTITIALS; NEOPLASMS; PROSTATE; SURVIVAL CURVES
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CRYSTAL DEFECTS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DISEASES; GLANDS; MALE GENITALS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; POINT DEFECTS; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.