Published May 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Higher breast cancer conspicuity on dbPET compared to WB-PET/CT

  • 1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto (Japan)
  • 2. Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto (Japan)

Description

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate lesion detectability of a dedicated breast positron-emission tomography (dbPET) scanner for breast cancers with an updated reconstruction mode, comparing it to whole-body positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (WB-PET/CT). Materials and methods: A total of 179 histologically-proven breast cancer lesions in 150 females who underwent both WB-PET/CT and dbPET with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose were retrospectively analyzed. The patient/breast/lesion-based sensitivities based on visual analysis were compared between dbPET and WB-PET/CT. For lesions visible on both PET images, SUVmax values of the tumors were measured, and tumor-to-background ratios (T/B ratios) of SUVmax were compared between the two scans. Subgroup analyses according to clinical tumor stage, histopathology and histological grade were also performed. Results: Patient/breast/lesion-based sensitivities were 95%, 95%, and 92%, respectively, for dbPET, and 95%, 94%, and 88%, respectively, for WB-PET/CT. Mean ± standard deviation SUVmax values of FDG-avid tumors were 13.0 ± 9.7 on dbPET and 6.4 ± 4.8 on WB-PET. T/B ratios were also significantly higher in dbPET than in WB-PET/CT (8.1 ± 7.1 vs. 5.1 ± 4.5). In the subgroup analysis, no significant differences in sensitivities between dbPET and WB-PET/CT were found. However, T/B ratios of dbPET were significantly higher than those of WB-PET/CT in cT1c, cT2, cT3, invasive cancer, invasive carcinoma of no special type, mucinous carcinoma and Grades 1–3. Conclusion: No significant differences in sensitivities were identified between dbPET using an updated reconstruction mode and WB-PET/CT; however, T/B ratios of dbPET were significantly higher than those of WB-PET/CT, indicating higher tumor conspicuity on dbPET.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.046

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.046;
PII
S0720-048X(17)30100-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
90
Journal Page Range
p. 138-145
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49088510
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
MAMMARY GLANDS; POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; GLANDS; ORGANS; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.