Published January 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Life cycle assessment of low-temperature thermal desorption-based technologies for drill cuttings treatment

  • 1. School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7 (Canada)
  • 2. Environmental Engineering Program, University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC), 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC, V2N 4Z9 (Canada)
  • 3. WZU-UNBC Joint Research Institute of Ecology and Environment, Wenzhou University (WZU), Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035 (China)
  • 4. Department of Mechanical and Marine Engineering, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien 28, 5063 Bergen (Norway)

Description

Highlights: • Life cycle impacts of thermal desorption treatments of drill cuttings were assessed. • Thermomechanical cuttings cleaner generated the lowest impacts using hydropower. • Rotary drum dryer generated the lowest impacts in onsite drill cutting treatment. • Thermal desorption process contributed 80–90 % of the total impacts of systems. • Regression models were developed to help estimate impacts of different treatments. The life cycle impacts of treatment of typical oil-based drill cuttings (OBDCs) using three low-temperature thermal desorption (LTTD)-based systems, including thermomechanical cuttings cleaner (TCC), screw-type dryer (STD), and rotary drum dryer (RDD), were explored with a case study in British Columbia, Canada. Two energy supply scenarios, including diesel generator-based onsite (scenario i) and hydropower-based offsite (scenario ii) treatments, were considered in the assessment. The results show that RDD generated the lowest life cycle impacts in terms of damages to human health, ecosystems, and resources in scenario i. TCC-scenario ii generated the lowest impacts among all assessed cases, suggesting that using renewable energy can greatly reduce the impacts of LTTD-based OBDCs treatment. Also, net environmental benefits could be achieved considering the reuse of recovered oil, and the highest net environmental benefits were obtained in TCC-scenario ii. The process contribution analysis found that thermal desorption process accounted for 80–95 % of impacts in almost all impact categories. Energy consumption contours and linear regression models were also developed to help drilling waste managers estimate the life cycle impacts of using hydropower-driven TCC to treat OBDCs with different water and oil contents.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123865

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123865;
PII
S0304389420318549;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal Volume
401
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0304-3894
CODEN
JHMAD9

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54025005
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; S13: HYDRO ENERGY;
Descriptors DEI
CUTTING; DESORPTION; DRILLING; DRILLS; DRYERS; ECOSYSTEMS; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
Descriptors DEC
DRILLING EQUIPMENT; ELECTRIC POWER; ENERGY SOURCES; EQUIPMENT; MACHINING; POWER; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SORPTION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.