Beta limits in long-pulse tokamak discharges
Creators
- Sauter, O.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- La Haye, R.J.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Chang, Z.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Gates, D.A.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Kamada, Y.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Zohm, H.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Bondeson, A.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Boucher, D.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Callen, J.D.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Chu, M.S.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Gianakon, T.A.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Gruber, O.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Harvey, R.W.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Hegna, C.C.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Lao, L.L.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Monticello, D.A.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Perkins, F.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Pletzer, A.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Reiman, A.H.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Rosenbluth, M.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Strait, E.J.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Taylor, T.S.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Turnbull, A.D.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Waelbroeck, F.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Wesley, J.C.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Wilson, H.R.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Yoshino, R.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- 1. IFS, University of Texas Austin, Texas 78712 (United States)
- 2. CompX, 12839 Via Grimaldi, Del Mar, California 92014 (United States)
- 3. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-16787 (United States)
- 4. Chalmers University of Technology, Goeteborg (Sweden)
- 5. MIP fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, 85748 Garching (Germany)
- 6. JAERI, Naka-machi, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken (Japan)
- 7. UKAEA Fusion, Culham, Abingdon, Oxfordshire (United Kingdom)
- 8. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 (United States)
- 9. General Atomics, San Diego, California 92186-5608 (United States)
- 10. ITER-JCT, 11025 N Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, California 92037 (United States)
- 11. CRPP, Assoc. Euratom-Switzerland, PPB-Ecublens, 1015 Lausanne (Switzerland)
Description
The maximum normalized beta achieved in long-pulse tokamak discharges at low collisionality falls significantly below both that observed in short pulse discharges and that predicted by the ideal MHD theory. Recent long-pulse experiments, in particular those simulating the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) M. Rosenbluth et al., Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1995), Vol. 2, p. 517 scenarios with low collisionality /sub e/sup *//, are often limited by low-m/n nonideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modes. The effect of saturated MHD modes is a reduction of the confinement time by 10% - 20%, depending on the island size and location, and can lead to a disruption. Recent theories on neoclassical destabilization of tearing modes, including the effects of a perturbed helical bootstrap current, are successful in explaining the qualitative behavior of the resistive modes and recent results are consistent with the size of the saturated islands. Also, a strong correlation is observed between the onset of these low-m/n modes with sawteeth, edge localized modes (ELM), or fishbone events, consistent with the seed island required by the theory. We will focus on a quantitative comparison between both the conventional resistive and neoclassical theories, and the experimental results of several machines, which have all observed these low-m/n nonideal modes. This enables us to single out the key issues in projecting the long-pulse beta limits of ITER-size tokamaks and also to discuss possible plasma control methods that can increase the soft limit, decrease the seed perturbations, and/or diminish the effects on confinement. copyright 1997 American Institute of Physics
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Physics of Plasmas
- Journal Volume
- 4
- Journal Issue
- 5
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1654-1664
- ISSN
- 1070-664X
- CODEN
- PHPAEN
Conference
- Title
- Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics of the American Physical Society
- Dates
- 11-15 Nov 1996
- Place
- Denver, CO (United States)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 29041127
- Subject category
- S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- BETA RATIO; ELECTRIC DISCHARGES; FISHBONE INSTABILITY; INSTABILITY GROWTH RATES; MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT; MHD EQUILIBRIUM; PLASMA DISRUPTION; PLASMA INSTABILITY; SAWTOOTH OSCILLATIONS; TEARING INSTABILITY; TOKAMAK DEVICES; TRANSPORT THEORY
- Descriptors DEC
- CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; CONFINEMENT; EQUILIBRIUM; INSTABILITY; OSCILLATIONS; PLASMA CONFINEMENT; PLASMA INSTABILITY; PLASMA MACROINSTABILITIES; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES
Optional Information
- Secondary number(s)
- CONF-961102--