Cross sections for nuclide production in 1 GeV proton-irradiated 208Pb
Creators
- Titarenko, Yu.E.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Shvedov, O.V.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Batyaev, V.F.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Karpikhin, E.I.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Zhivun, V.M.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Koldobsky, A.B.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Mulambetov, R.D.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Kvasova, S.V.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Sosnin, A.N.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Mashnik, S.G.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Prael, R.E.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Sierk, A.J.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Gabriel, T.A.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Saito, M.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Yasuda, H.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- 1. Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195 (Japan)
- 2. Tokyo Institute of Technology 2-12-1, O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152 (Japan)
- 3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 (United States)
- 4. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 (United States)
- 5. Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B. Cheremushkinskaya 25, RU-117259 Moscow (Russian Federation)
Description
We measure 114 nuclide-production cross sections for an isotopically enriched 208Pb target bombarded with 1.0 GeV protons. The cross sections are determined using direct γ spectrometry with a high-resolution Ge detector. The cross sections are compared to another experiment which used γ spectrometry with a natural Pb target; our results average 7.5% less for nuclides measured in common. They are also compared to a kinematically inverse reaction of 1 GeV/nucleon 208Pb interacting with a hydrogen target; we find our results average 15% higher than those for (a different set of) common nuclides. We find there is a systematic discrepancy between the cross sections found from the two very different experimental techniques. We also compare our measurements to eight different models. We find most are fairly reliable in predicting cross sections for nuclides not too far away in mass from Pb, but differ greatly in their reliability for nuclides in the deep-spallation and fission mass regions. In the spallation region (A > or approx. 155), the CEM2K code, which includes an intranuclear cascade, followed by a preequilibrium stage, leading finally to equilibrium decay, gives the best representation of our data. In the center of the fission/fragmentation mass region, the INUCL code is the most accurate. INUCL includes the same basic ingredients of cascade, preequilibrium, and evaporation, but differs considerably in details. It also contains a comprehensive fission model, which is lacking in CEM2K. No simulation code tested is reliable for the entire mass range of nuclides measured
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.65.064610;
- arXiv
- arXiv:nucl-th/0011083v1;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Physical Review. C, Nuclear Physics
- Journal Volume
- 65
- Journal Issue
- 6
- Journal Page Range
- p. 064610-064610.19
- ISSN
- 0556-2813
- CODEN
- PRVCAN
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 35093987
- Subject category
- S73: NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; S46: INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CROSS SECTIONS; FISSION; LEAD 208 TARGET; NUCLEAR FRAGMENTATION; PROTON REACTIONS; SPALLATION; STATISTICAL MODELS
- Descriptors DEC
- BARYON REACTIONS; CHARGED-PARTICLE REACTIONS; HADRON REACTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUCLEAR REACTIONS; NUCLEON REACTIONS; TARGETS
Optional Information
- Notes
- (c) 2002 The American Physical Society