Emission quantification using the tracer gas dispersion method: The influence of instrument, tracer gas species and source simulation
Creators
- 1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet, Bygning 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby (Denmark)
- 2. FORCE Technology, Park Alle 345, 2605 Brøndby (Denmark)
- 3. FluxSense AB, SE-41296 Göteborg (Sweden)
Description
Highlights: • Emission rates varied up to 18% when multiple analytical instruments were used. • The analytical instrument should have good precision and high detection frequency. • The ratio of the tracer gas release rate to instrument precision should be high. • Upwind tracer gas misplacement results in emission measurement errors of up to 50%. The tracer gas dispersion method (TDM) is a remote sensing method used for quantifying fugitive emissions by relying on the controlled release of a tracer gas at the source, combined with concentration measurements of the tracer and target gas plumes. The TDM was tested at a wastewater treatment plant for plant-integrated methane emission quantification, using four analytical instruments simultaneously and four different tracer gases. Measurements performed using a combination of an analytical instrument and a tracer gas, with a high ratio between the tracer gas release rate and instrument precision (a high release-precision ratio), resulted in well-defined plumes with a high signal-to-noise ratio and a high methane-to-tracer gas correlation factor. Measured methane emission rates differed by up to 18% from the mean value when measurements were performed using seven different instrument and tracer gas combinations. Analytical instruments with a high detection frequency and good precision were established as the most suitable for successful TDM application. The application of an instrument with a poor precision could only to some extent be overcome by applying a higher tracer gas release rate. A sideward misplacement of the tracer gas release point of about 250 m resulted in an emission rate comparable to those obtained using a tracer gas correctly simulating the methane emission. Conversely, an upwind misplacement of about 150 m resulted in an emission rate overestimation of almost 50%, showing the importance of proper emission source simulation when applying the TDM.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.289Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.289;
- PII
- S0048969718310489;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 634
- Journal Page Range
- p. 59-66
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53026475
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- DETECTION; DISPERSIONS; ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION; EMISSION; GASES; METHANE; PLUMES; REMOTE SENSING; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; TRACER TECHNIQUES; WASTE WATER; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
- Descriptors DEC
- ALKANES; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; FLUIDS; HYDROCARBONS; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; ISOTOPE APPLICATIONS; LIQUID WASTES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; WASTES; WATER
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.