Published September 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Emission quantification using the tracer gas dispersion method: The influence of instrument, tracer gas species and source simulation

  • 1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet, Bygning 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby (Denmark)
  • 2. FORCE Technology, Park Alle 345, 2605 Brøndby (Denmark)
  • 3. FluxSense AB, SE-41296 Göteborg (Sweden)

Description

Highlights: • Emission rates varied up to 18% when multiple analytical instruments were used. • The analytical instrument should have good precision and high detection frequency. • The ratio of the tracer gas release rate to instrument precision should be high. • Upwind tracer gas misplacement results in emission measurement errors of up to 50%. The tracer gas dispersion method (TDM) is a remote sensing method used for quantifying fugitive emissions by relying on the controlled release of a tracer gas at the source, combined with concentration measurements of the tracer and target gas plumes. The TDM was tested at a wastewater treatment plant for plant-integrated methane emission quantification, using four analytical instruments simultaneously and four different tracer gases. Measurements performed using a combination of an analytical instrument and a tracer gas, with a high ratio between the tracer gas release rate and instrument precision (a high release-precision ratio), resulted in well-defined plumes with a high signal-to-noise ratio and a high methane-to-tracer gas correlation factor. Measured methane emission rates differed by up to 18% from the mean value when measurements were performed using seven different instrument and tracer gas combinations. Analytical instruments with a high detection frequency and good precision were established as the most suitable for successful TDM application. The application of an instrument with a poor precision could only to some extent be overcome by applying a higher tracer gas release rate. A sideward misplacement of the tracer gas release point of about 250 m resulted in an emission rate comparable to those obtained using a tracer gas correctly simulating the methane emission. Conversely, an upwind misplacement of about 150 m resulted in an emission rate overestimation of almost 50%, showing the importance of proper emission source simulation when applying the TDM.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.289

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.289;
PII
S0048969718310489;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
634
Journal Page Range
p. 59-66
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.