Published January 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Investigation of warm gas clean-up of biofuel flue and producer gas using electrostatic precipitator

  • 1. Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Department of Thermal and Nuclear Energy, Studentu 56, Kaunas LT-51424 (Lithuania)
  • 2. Lithuanian Energy Institute, Nuclear Engineering Laboratory, 3 Breslaujos, Kaunas LT44403 (Lithuania)
  • 3. Brunel University London, Institute of Energy Futures, College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, UB8 3PH Uxbridge (United Kingdom)
  • 4. Lithuanian Energy Institute, Laboratory of Combustion Processes, 3 Breslaujos, Kaunas LT44403 (Lithuania)
  • 5. Lithuanian Energy Institute, Laboratory of Heat Equipment Research and Testing, 3 Breslaujos, Kaunas LT44403 (Lithuania)
  • 6. Lithuanian Energy Institute, Plasma Processing Laboratory, 3 Breslaujos, Kaunas LT44403 (Lithuania)

Description

Highlights: • Investigation of ESP efficiency in two different gas flows. • Experiments with one and two parallel electrodes. • Different ESP collection efficiency variation with voltage in case of flue gas and biogas. • Measurements of particles size and their chemical composition performed. The use of biofuels has been increasing in Europe over recent years. However, NOx and emissions of fine particulates are important and in that respect biofuel is still at a disadvantage when compared with oil and natural gas-fired systems. Electrostatic precipitators are the most widely used of the high-efficiency devices for the catching fine particulates. In this comparative study on biofuel (wood pellets), the ESP collection efficiency was investigated for solid particles from a boiler (50 kW) and from a gasifier (100 kW). Although releases of solid particles from modern boilers are low, a combination of such a boiler with an electrostatic precipitator may reduce the release of particles to a minimum. The collection efficiency of the ESP obtained during the investigation with the flue gas was ∼98–99%. There is a big difference in particle concentrations when comparing the systems with flue gas and producer gas. As the working conditions in the test section with the producer gas were more challenging, this leads to a lower efficiency for the electrostatic precipitator (∼75%). The obtained particle sizes and chemical composition of solid particles give better understanding of the problem under investigation.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.120

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.120;
PII
S0360544217319783;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
143
Journal Page Range
p. 943-949
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.