Published May 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Constraint-consistent Runge–Kutta methods for one-dimensional incompressible multiphase flow

  • 1. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 2. Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen (Netherlands)

Description

Highlights: • A new time integration method is proposed for the one-dimensional two-fluid model. • Incompressibility constraints in the model are related to Riemann invariants and DAEs. • The new method ensures conservation, constraint consistency, and avoids order reduction. • New boundary conditions respecting both wave directions and constraints are proposed. • Liquid sloshing and gas production ramp-up can be simulated with the new method. -- Abstract: New time integration methods are proposed for simulating incompressible multiphase flow in pipelines described by the one-dimensional two-fluid model. The methodology is based on 'half-explicit' Runge–Kutta methods, being explicit for the mass and momentum equations and implicit for the volume constraint. These half-explicit methods are constraint-consistent, i.e., they satisfy the hidden constraints of the two-fluid model, namely the volumetric flow (incompressibility) constraint and the Poisson equation for the pressure. A novel analysis shows that these hidden constraints are present in the continuous, semi-discrete, and fully discrete equations. Next to constraint-consistency, the new methods are conservative: the original mass and momentum equations are solved, and the proper shock conditions are satisfied; efficient: the implicit constraint is rewritten into a pressure Poisson equation, and the time step for the explicit part is restricted by a CFL condition based on the convective wave speeds; and accurate: achieving high order temporal accuracy for all solution components (masses, velocities, and pressure). High-order accuracy is obtained by constructing a new third-order Runge–Kutta method that satisfies the additional order conditions arising from the presence of the constraint in combination with time-dependent boundary conditions. Two test cases (Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities in a pipeline and liquid sloshing in a cylindrical tank) show that for time-independent boundary conditions the half-explicit formulation with a classic fourth-order Runge–Kutta method accurately integrates the two-fluid model equations in time while preserving all constraints. A third test case (ramp-up of gas production in a multiphase pipeline) shows that our new third-order method is preferred for cases featuring time-dependent boundary conditions.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.02.001

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jcp.2019.02.001;
PII
S0021999119300683;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Computational Physics (Print)
Journal Volume
384
Journal Page Range
p. 170-199
ISSN
0021-9991
CODEN
JCTPAH

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.