Decomposition of rebound effect: An energy-specific, general equilibrium analysis in the context of China
- 1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 (China)
- 2. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 (China)
- 3. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190 (China)
- 4. Research Institute of Global Value Chains, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029 (China)
- 5. School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001 (China)
- 6. Land & Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Canberra ACT 2601 (Australia)
- 7. School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444 (China)
Description
Highlights: • Energy-specific, macro-level rebound effect is decomposed into sector level. • Sector rebound effect is decomposed into output effect and substitution effect. • Final demand leads to more rebound in secondary energy than in primary energy. • Rebound in an energy is mainly caused by the big users of this energy. • Energy producing sectors contribute negatively to rebound. The objective of this study is to trace and quantify the sources of rebound effect for different energy sources in China. This paper decomposes the economy-wide rebound effect into 135 production sector-level rebound effects and five final demand components. The sector-level rebound is further decomposed into output effect and substitution effect. A two-stage decomposition method and a static computable general equilibrium model are developed to achieve this. Five types of energy-specific efficiency improvements are introduced, respectively, in all the production sectors. Results show that improving efficiency of using coal leads to the smallest macro-level rebound. For rebound decomposition, four findings are generalized. First, final consumption shows larger impact on the rebound of secondary energy sources than on primary energy sources. Second, production sectors that are big user of the efficiency-exposed energy source are expected to be key rebound contributor. Third, energy-producing sectors make negative rebound contribution. Results also show that, substitution effect is the predominant mechanism that triggers sector-level rebound. Policy implications are also discussed.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.074Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.074;
- PII
- S0306261918304136;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Applied Energy
- Journal Volume
- 221
- Journal Page Range
- p. 280-298
- ISSN
- 0306-2619
- CODEN
- APENDX
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 52114479
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHINA; COAL; ECONOMY; ENERGY DEMAND; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; DEMAND; EFFICIENCY; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; MATERIALS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.