Published March 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Energy and CO2 emissions efficiency of major economies: A network DEA approach

  • 1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081 (China)
  • 2. Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, Beijing, 100081 (China)
  • 3. Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental Management, Beijing, 100081 (China)
  • 4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in Beijing, Beijing, 100081 (China)
  • 5. Center for Energy & Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081 (China)

Description

Highlights: • Measures economic and distributive efficiencies of economies. • Analyzes energy and CO2 emissions efficiency using the above stated efficiencies. • Uses Network DEA SBM model free link case with undesirable outputs in both stages. • In aggregate 85% of energy used and 89% of CO2 emissions was in excess of target. • Direct and indirect policy measures are suggested to solve efficiency issues. This study extends the analysis of energy and CO2 emissions efficiency of economies from the black box to a network structure analysis realizing the fact that each economy is a network of two divisions responsible for production and distribution of economic outputs. Hence, its economic and distributive efficiencies must be taken into account while analyzing the energy and CO2 emissions efficiency. In order to analyze energy and CO2 emissions efficiency of economies in terms of economic and distributive efficiencies simultaneously, we have innovatively applied network DEA model free link case under free disposability assumption for all undesirable outputs in both divisions of economies. The results are tantalizing as we have found that in aggregate 85% of energy consumption and 89% of CO2 emissions were just because of economic and distributive inefficiencies. Although none of the economies was overall efficient but a few were efficient in one of the two divisions. China was the largest user of excess energy because of economic inefficiency and the USA was the largest user of excess energy because of distributive inefficiency. We have suggested that inefficient economies not only need rightly directed taxation laws, incentives, and penalties but also need reforms in economic structures.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.012

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.012;
PII
S0360544218300124;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
147
Journal Page Range
p. 197-207
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53001108
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
CARBON DIOXIDE; CHINA; ECONOMY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; USA
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EFFICIENCY; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; NORTH AMERICA; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.