Published February 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Design, optimization and comparative study of a solar CPC with a fully illuminated tubular receiver and a fin inverted V-shaped receiver

  • 1. Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd. Benito Juárez y Calle de la Normal S/N, 21280 Mexicali (Mexico)
  • 2. Centro de Investigación en Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, 62209 Morelos (Mexico)
  • 3. Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd. Benito Juárez y Calle de la Normal S/N, 21280 Mexicali (Mexico)

Description

Highlights: • New variant of CPC with tubular receiver and a fin inverted V-shaped was analyzed. • Comparative study of ray-tracing between two geometries of CPC was carried out. • CPC with tubular receiver is viable in arrangements with solar tracking system. • CPC with finned receiver is viable in arrangements without solar tracking system. • Arrangements of CPC finned without solar tracking presents lower optical end losses. This work presents the design, optimization, and a comparative study of a compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) using a tube as a receiver with and without a fin inverted V-shaped receiver (finned receiver). The study was mainly based on numerical analysis obtained by using a ray-tracing simulator in CPCs, in order to evaluate the amount of solar irradiation collected on four dates of the year. A north-south orientation was chosen, with and without a solar tracking system, at a fixed tilt angle of 32 and 0° for each case. The results showed that a CPC using a tubular receiver with a solar tracking system and a surface tilt of 32 and 0° reaches solar irradiation levels of 27.96 and 25.35 kWh/m2, while a CPC with a finned receiver reaches 26.87 and 24.98 kWh/m2, respectively. In the case of arrangements without a solar tracking system, the values reached were 7.03 and 5.60 kWh/m2for tubular receiver and 16.83 and 12.85 kWh/m2 for the finned receiver, respectively. CPC with a tubular receiver proved to be more feasible when using a solar tracking system, in contrast to a CPC with a finned receiver, which had better feasibility in arrangements that do not include solar tracking.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116141

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116141;
PII
S1359431120336218;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Thermal Engineering
Journal Volume
184
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
1359-4311
CODEN
ATENFT

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53112860
Subject category
S14: SOLAR ENERGY; S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
COMPOUND PARABOLIC CONCENTRATORS; DESIGN; END EFFECTS; GEOMETRY; IRRADIATION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATORS; SOLAR TRACKING SYSTEMS; SURFACES
Descriptors DEC
ANALOG SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT; FUNCTIONAL MODELS; HELIOSTATS; MATHEMATICS; SOLAR CELL ARRAYS; SOLAR COLLECTORS; SOLAR CONCENTRATORS; SOLAR EQUIPMENT; SOLAR TRACKING

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.