Design, optimization and comparative study of a solar CPC with a fully illuminated tubular receiver and a fin inverted V-shaped receiver
Creators
- 1. Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd. Benito Juárez y Calle de la Normal S/N, 21280 Mexicali (Mexico)
- 2. Centro de Investigación en Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, 62209 Morelos (Mexico)
- 3. Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Blvd. Benito Juárez y Calle de la Normal S/N, 21280 Mexicali (Mexico)
Description
Highlights: • New variant of CPC with tubular receiver and a fin inverted V-shaped was analyzed. • Comparative study of ray-tracing between two geometries of CPC was carried out. • CPC with tubular receiver is viable in arrangements with solar tracking system. • CPC with finned receiver is viable in arrangements without solar tracking system. • Arrangements of CPC finned without solar tracking presents lower optical end losses. This work presents the design, optimization, and a comparative study of a compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) using a tube as a receiver with and without a fin inverted V-shaped receiver (finned receiver). The study was mainly based on numerical analysis obtained by using a ray-tracing simulator in CPCs, in order to evaluate the amount of solar irradiation collected on four dates of the year. A north-south orientation was chosen, with and without a solar tracking system, at a fixed tilt angle of 32 and 0° for each case. The results showed that a CPC using a tubular receiver with a solar tracking system and a surface tilt of 32 and 0° reaches solar irradiation levels of 27.96 and 25.35 kWh/m2, while a CPC with a finned receiver reaches 26.87 and 24.98 kWh/m2, respectively. In the case of arrangements without a solar tracking system, the values reached were 7.03 and 5.60 kWh/m2for tubular receiver and 16.83 and 12.85 kWh/m2 for the finned receiver, respectively. CPC with a tubular receiver proved to be more feasible when using a solar tracking system, in contrast to a CPC with a finned receiver, which had better feasibility in arrangements that do not include solar tracking.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116141Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116141;
- PII
- S1359431120336218;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Applied Thermal Engineering
- Journal Volume
- 184
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 1359-4311
- CODEN
- ATENFT
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53112860
- Subject category
- S14: SOLAR ENERGY; S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPOUND PARABOLIC CONCENTRATORS; DESIGN; END EFFECTS; GEOMETRY; IRRADIATION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATORS; SOLAR TRACKING SYSTEMS; SURFACES
- Descriptors DEC
- ANALOG SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT; FUNCTIONAL MODELS; HELIOSTATS; MATHEMATICS; SOLAR CELL ARRAYS; SOLAR COLLECTORS; SOLAR CONCENTRATORS; SOLAR EQUIPMENT; SOLAR TRACKING
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.