Published January 1, 2008 | Version v1
Journal article

Adjuvant Brachytherapy Removes Survival Disadvantage of Local Disease Extension in Stage IIIC Endometrial Cancer: A SEER Registry Analysis

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (United States)
  • 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (United States)

Description

Purpose: To assess the role of radiotherapy (RT) in women with Stage IIIC endometrial cancer. Methods and Materials: The 17-registry Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for patients with lymph node-positive non-Stage IV epithelial endometrial cancer diagnosed and treated between 1988 and 1998. Two subgroups were identified: those with organ-confined Stage IIIC endometrial cancer and those with Stage IIIC endometrial cancer with direct extension of the primary tumor. RT was coded as external beam RT (EBRT) or brachytherapy (BT). Observed survival (OS) was reported with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up; the survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Results: The therapy data revealed 611 women with Stage IIIC endometrial cancer during this period. Of these women, 51% were treated with adjuvant EBRT, 21% with EBRT and BT, and 28% with no additional RT (NAT). Of the 611 patients, 293 had organ-confined Stage IIIC endometrial cancer and 318 patients had Stage IIIC endometrial cancer with direct extension of the primary tumor. The 5-year OS rate for all patients was 40% with NAT, 56% after EBRT, and 64% after EBRT/BT. Adjuvant RT improved survival compared with NAT (p <0.001). In patients with organ-confined Stage IIIC endometrial cancer, the 5-year OS rate was 50% for NAT, 64% for EBRT, and 67% for EBRT/BT. Again, adjuvant RT contributed to improved survival compared with NAT (p = 0.02). In patients with Stage IIIC endometrial cancer and direct tumor extension, the 5-year OS rate was 34% for NAT, 47% for EBRT, and 63% for EBRT/BT. RT improved OS compared with NAT (p <0.001). Also, in this high-risk subgroup, adding BT to EBRT was superior to EBRT alone (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Women with Stage IIIC endometrial cancer receiving adjuvant EBRT and EBRT/BT had improved OS compared with patients receiving NAT. When direct extension of the primary tumor was present, the addition of BT to EBRT was even more beneficial

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.048

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.048;
PII
S0360-3016(07)00978-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
70
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 134-138
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
39059710
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BEAMS; BRACHYTHERAPY; CARCINOMAS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH HAZARDS; LYMPH NODES; PATIENTS; SURVIVAL CURVES; WOMEN
Descriptors DEC
ANIMALS; DISEASES; FEMALES; HAZARDS; LYMPHATIC SYSTEM; MAMMALS; MAN; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PRIMATES; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, All rights reserved.