Published December 21, 2013
| Version v1
Journal article
Did the LHC detectors meet our expectations?
Creators
Description
By showing comparisons between the achieved performance and the expected one from the various sub-detectors of the large LHC Experiments at conditions that exceed the original design, it will be shown that the first answer is yes, BUT. The BUT will be dedicated to various problems encountered with industrial orders and design mistakes, and what lessons one should learn from these issues
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.05.029Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.nima.2013.05.029;
- PII
- S0168-9002(13)00557-3;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
- Journal Volume
- 732
- Journal Page Range
- p. 25-33
- ISSN
- 0168-9002
- CODEN
- NIMAER
Conference
- Title
- 13. Vienna conference on instrumentation
- Dates
- 11-15 Feb 2013
- Place
- Vienna (Austria)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 45051590
- Subject category
- S46: INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- CERN LHC; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DESIGN; MULTIPARTICLE SPECTROMETERS; PARTICLE IDENTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; SHOWER COUNTERS; SI SEMICONDUCTOR DETECTORS
- Descriptors DEC
- ACCELERATORS; CYCLIC ACCELERATORS; EVALUATION; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; RADIATION DETECTORS; SEMICONDUCTOR DETECTORS; SPECTROMETERS; STORAGE RINGS; SYNCHROTRONS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.