Energy resources' utilization in organic and conventional vineyards: Energy flow, greenhouse gas emissions and biofuel production
Creators
- 1. Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki (Greece)
- 2. Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki (Greece)
Description
An energy analysis, in conventional and organic vineyards, combined with ethanol production and greenhouse gas emissions, is useful in evaluating present situation and deciding best management strategies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences in the energy flow between organic and conventional vineyards in three locations, to calculate CO2, CH4 and N2O-emissions based on the used fossil energy and to explore if wine industry wastes can be used to extract bioethanol. The data were collected through personal interviews with farmers during 2004-2005. Eighteen farmers, who owned vineyards about 1 ha each, were randomly selected to participate in this study [(3 conventional and 3 organic) x 3 locations]. The means averaged over all locations for fertilizer application, plant protection products application, transportation, harvesting, labor, machinery, fuels, plant protections products and tools energy inputs, total energy inputs, outputs (grapes), outputs (grapes + shoots), grape yield, man hour, pomace and ethanol from pomace were significantly higher in conventional than in organic vineyards, while the opposite occurred for the pruning. Means averaged over two farming systems for harvesting, tools energy inputs, energy outputs (grapes), grape yield, pomace and ethanol from pomace were significantly higher at location A, followed by location C and location B. Finally, for irrigation, the means averaged over the two farming systems were significantly lower at location C. Greenhouse gas emissions were significant lower in organic than in conventional vineyards. The results show a clear response of energy inputs to energy outputs that resulted from the farming system and location.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.006Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.006;
- PII
- S0961-9534(09)00097-X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Journal Volume
- 33
- Journal Issue
- 9
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1239-1250
- ISSN
- 0961-9534
- CODEN
- BMSBEO
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 45015507
- Subject category
- S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
- Descriptors DEI
- BEVERAGES; BIOETHANOL; BIOFUELS; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY ANALYSIS; FARMS; GRAPES; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; GREENHOUSE GASES; HARVESTING; METHANE; NITROUS OXIDE
- Descriptors DEC
- ALCOHOLS; ALKANES; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; ETHANOL; FOOD; FRUITS; FUELS; HYDROCARBONS; HYDROXY COMPOUNDS; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; NITROGEN OXIDES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.