Published February 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0

  • 1. VU University Medical Centre, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 2. University of La Rioja, Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, San Pedro Hospital and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logrono, La Rioja (Spain)
  • 3. Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Nijmegen (Netherlands)
  • 4. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Lyon (France)
  • 5. Municipal Hospital Karlsruhe Inc., Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karlsruhe (Germany)
  • 6. University of Cologne, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cologne (Germany)
  • 7. Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
  • 8. King's College London, King's Health Partners, PET Imaging Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, London (United Kingdom)
  • 9. Memorial Sloan Kettering Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY (United States)
  • 10. Antwerp University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antwerp (Belgium)
  • 11. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Nashville, TN (United States)
  • 12. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 13. Invivo Molecular Imaging LLC, Gray, TN (United States)
  • 14. University of Iowa, Department of Radiology, Iowa City, IA (United States)
  • 15. Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rozzano, MI (Italy)
  • 16. VU University Medical Centre, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 17. Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Den Bosch (Netherlands)
  • 18. University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Groningen (Netherlands)
  • 19. Catharina Hospital, Department of Clinical Physics, Eindhoven (Netherlands)
  • 20. University Hospital Dresden, Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, Dresden (Germany)
  • 21. University Hospital Essen, Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, Essen (Germany)
  • 22. Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna (Austria)
  • 23. University Hospital Rostock, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock (Germany)

Description

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when he or she is examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and institutes that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semiquantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Journal Volume
42
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 328-354
ISSN
1619-7070