Published May 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Ultrasound-Guided Angioplasty of Dysfunctional Vascular Access for Haemodialysis. The Pros and Cons

  • 1. "Reina Sofia" University Hospital, Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology (Spain)
  • 2. University of Murcia, Faculty of Medicine (Spain)

Description

PurposeTo describe the benefits and the disadvantages of angioplasty in dialysis fistulas using only ultrasound guidance.Materials and MethodsThis is a prospective study in 132 failing or non-maturing arteriovenous accesses that underwent 189 ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasties. The technical success was defined as non-use of X-ray fluoroscopy during the procedure.Results127 procedures (67%) were successfully completed without fluoroscopy. Most failures were due to difficulty to traverse aneurismal segments, as well as anastomotic stenoses. Including initial failures, the primary patency rates at 6, 12 months and 2 years were 75 ± 3, 41 ± 3 and 14 ± 2%, respectively.ConclusionEndovascular repair of the dysfunctional vascular access for haemodialysis under ultrasound guidance is feasible and safe in roughly two-thirds of cases.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
Journal Volume
40
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 750-754
ISSN
0174-1551
CODEN
CAIRDG

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48093822
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BALLOONS; DIALYSIS; FAILURES; FLUOROSCOPY; REPAIR; VASCULAR DISEASES
Descriptors DEC
AIRCRAFT; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; SEPARATION PROCESSES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE)
Notes
http://www.springer-ny.com