Published May 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

The consequences of increasing block tariffs on the distribution of residential electricity subsidies in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • 1. Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, New East Building, CB 3140, NC 27599 (United States)
  • 2. Global Development Institute, University of Manchester (United Kingdom)
  • 3. Departments of Environmental Sciences & Engineering, and City and Regional Planning, CB7431, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • Electricity subsidies received by households in Addis Ababa (2015/2016) were large. • Wealthy households receive more subsidies than poor households. • Most poor households share their electricity connections. • The increasing block tariff structure is not incentivizing wise use of electricity. -- Abstract: This study evaluates the distribution of electricity subsidies to residential customers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in 2016 that results from the current increasing block tariff (IBT) structure. Customer billing data supplied by the electricity utility were matched with socioeconomic information collected from a survey of 987 households, and used with a utility-specific estimate of the costs of electricity service to estimate household-specific subsidies. The analysis differentiates between primary customers, who own an electricity account, and nonprimary customers, who pay a primary account holder, and presents the first detailed analysis of the incidence of subsidies provided to households with private versus shared electricity connections. Results show that households in the poorest quintile received 7% of the total subsidy, while households in the wealthiest quintile received 37%. The majority of households with shared connections were in poorer quintiles, and 80% in the poorest quintile were nonprimary customers. The regressive outcomes of the IBT structure are explained by two of its attributes: (1) the volumetric rates in all tariff blocks are substantially below the total average cost of delivery of the service; and (2) there is only a moderate association between electricity consumption and household wealth.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.033;
PII
S0301421519300394;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
128
Journal Page Range
p. 783-795
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55007456
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ELECTRICITY; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; HOUSEHOLDS; PUBLIC OPINION; TARIFFS
Descriptors DEC
PUBLIC UTILITIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.