Towards a more holistic sustainability assessment framework for agro-bioenergy systems — A review
- 1. Potsdam University, Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Golm (Germany)
- 2. Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Straße 84, 15374 Müncheberg (Germany)
- 3. Faculty of Landscape Management and Nature Conservation, University for Sustainable Development (HNEE), Schickler Strasse 5, 16225 Eberswalde (Germany)
- 4. ITC, Faculty of Geoinformation and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Hengelosestraat 99, Enschede (Netherlands)
Description
The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a sustainability assessment tool for agro-bioenergy system usually has an industrial agriculture bias. Furthermore, LCA generally has often been criticized for being a decision maker tool which may not consider decision takers perceptions. They are lacking in spatial and temporal depth, and unable to assess sufficiently some environmental impact categories such as biodiversity, land use etc. and most economic and social impact categories, e.g. food security, water security, energy security. This study explored tools, methodologies and frameworks that can be deployed individually, as well as in combination with each other for bridging these methodological gaps in application to agro-bioenergy systems. Integrating agronomic options, e.g. alternative farm power, tillage, seed sowing options, fertilizer, pesticide, irrigation into the boundaries of LCAs for agro-bioenergy systems will not only provide an alternative agro-ecological perspective to previous LCAs, but will also lead to the derivation of indicators for assessment of some social and economic impact categories. Deploying life cycle thinking approaches such as energy return on energy invested-EROEI, human appropriation of net primary production-HANPP, net greenhouse gas or carbon balance-NCB, water footprint individually and in combination with each other will also lead to further derivation of indicators suitable for assessing relevant environmental, social and economic impact categories. Also, applying spatio-temporal simulation models has a potential for improving the spatial and temporal depths of LCA analysis.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.008Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.008;
- PII
- S0195-9255(16)30094-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review
- Journal Volume
- 62
- Journal Page Range
- p. 61-75
- ISSN
- 0195-9255
- CODEN
- EIARDK
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49036974
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- AGRICULTURE; CARBON; CULTIVATION TECHNIQUES; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENERGY SECURITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FERTILIZERS; GREENHOUSE GASES; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PESTICIDES; SOCIAL IMPACT; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SUSTAINABILITY
- Descriptors DEC
- ELEMENTS; NONMETALS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.