Published November 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Increasing source to image distance for AP pelvis imaging – Impact on radiation dose and image quality

  • 1. School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, The Crescent, Salford M5 AWT (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd Road, Gwynedd LL57 2PW (United Kingdom)
  • 3. Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Eyssoniusplein 18, 9714 CE Groningen (Netherlands)
  • 4. Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Avenida Dom João II Lote 4.69.01, 1990-096 Lisboa (Portugal)
  • 5. Haute École de Santé Vaud—FilièreTRM, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Avenue de Beaumont 21, 1011 Lausanne (Switzerland)
  • 6. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, N-0130 Oslo (Norway)

Description

Aim: A quantative primary study to determine whether increasing source to image distance (SID), with and without the use of automatic exposure control (AEC) for antero-posterior (AP) pelvis imaging, reduces dose whilst still producing an image of diagnostic quality. Methods: Using a computed radiography (CR) system, an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom was positioned for an AP examination using the table bucky. SID was initially set at 110 cm, with tube potential set at a constant 75 kVp, with two outer chambers selected and a fine focal spot of 0.6 mm. SID was then varied from 90 cm to 140 cm with two exposures made at each 5 cm interval, one using the AEC and another with a constant 16 mAs derived from the initial exposure. Effective dose (E) and entrance surface dose (ESD) were calculated for each acquisition. Seven experienced observers blindly graded image quality using a 5-point Likert scale and 2 Alternative Forced Choice software. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) was calculated for comparison. For each acquisition, femoral head diameter was also measured for magnification indication. Results: Results demonstrated that when increasing SID from 110 cm to 140 cm, both E and ESD reduced by 3.7% and 17.3% respectively when using AEC and 50.13% and 41.79% respectively, when the constant mAs was used. No significant statistical (T-test) difference (p = 0.967) between image quality was detected when increasing SID, with an intra-observer correlation of 0.77 (95% confidence level). SNR reduced slightly for both AEC (38%) and no AEC (36%) with increasing SID. Conclusion: For CR, increasing SID significantly reduces both E and ESD for AP pelvis imaging without adversely affecting image quality

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.05.012

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radi.2014.05.012;
PII
S1078-8174(14)00067-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiography (London 1995)
Journal Volume
20
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 351-355
ISSN
1078-8174

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46124485
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATIONS; PELVIS; PHANTOMS; RADIATION DOSES; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; DOSES; MEDICINE; MOCKUP; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.