Increasing source to image distance for AP pelvis imaging – Impact on radiation dose and image quality
Creators
- 1. School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, The Crescent, Salford M5 AWT (United Kingdom)
- 2. Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd Road, Gwynedd LL57 2PW (United Kingdom)
- 3. Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Eyssoniusplein 18, 9714 CE Groningen (Netherlands)
- 4. Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Avenida Dom João II Lote 4.69.01, 1990-096 Lisboa (Portugal)
- 5. Haute École de Santé Vaud—FilièreTRM, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Avenue de Beaumont 21, 1011 Lausanne (Switzerland)
- 6. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, N-0130 Oslo (Norway)
Description
Aim: A quantative primary study to determine whether increasing source to image distance (SID), with and without the use of automatic exposure control (AEC) for antero-posterior (AP) pelvis imaging, reduces dose whilst still producing an image of diagnostic quality. Methods: Using a computed radiography (CR) system, an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom was positioned for an AP examination using the table bucky. SID was initially set at 110 cm, with tube potential set at a constant 75 kVp, with two outer chambers selected and a fine focal spot of 0.6 mm. SID was then varied from 90 cm to 140 cm with two exposures made at each 5 cm interval, one using the AEC and another with a constant 16 mAs derived from the initial exposure. Effective dose (E) and entrance surface dose (ESD) were calculated for each acquisition. Seven experienced observers blindly graded image quality using a 5-point Likert scale and 2 Alternative Forced Choice software. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) was calculated for comparison. For each acquisition, femoral head diameter was also measured for magnification indication. Results: Results demonstrated that when increasing SID from 110 cm to 140 cm, both E and ESD reduced by 3.7% and 17.3% respectively when using AEC and 50.13% and 41.79% respectively, when the constant mAs was used. No significant statistical (T-test) difference (p = 0.967) between image quality was detected when increasing SID, with an intra-observer correlation of 0.77 (95% confidence level). SNR reduced slightly for both AEC (38%) and no AEC (36%) with increasing SID. Conclusion: For CR, increasing SID significantly reduces both E and ESD for AP pelvis imaging without adversely affecting image quality
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.05.012Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radi.2014.05.012;
- PII
- S1078-8174(14)00067-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiography (London 1995)
- Journal Volume
- 20
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Journal Page Range
- p. 351-355
- ISSN
- 1078-8174
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46124485
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATIONS; PELVIS; PHANTOMS; RADIATION DOSES; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; DOSES; MEDICINE; MOCKUP; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.