Published April 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Comments on "Comparative analysis of standby systems with unreliable server and switching failure" [Relib Eng Syst Saf 2016; 145: 74–82]

Creators

Description

This work first illustrates that Figure 9 which is given by Kuo and Ke (2016) is incorrect. The incorrect of Figure 9 is due to the inaccuracy of Equation (18). We point out some other deficiencies and errors found in the above referenced paper, which imply that the numerical results are not trustworthy. We suggest the modified expresstions of the steady-state availabilities for three different configurations. Some numerical examples are presented to illustrate that the new expressions of the availabilities is correct.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.005

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.005;
PII
S0951-8320(16)30250-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
160
Journal Page Range
p. 98-100
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48064701
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
AVAILABILITY; CONFIGURATION; EQUATIONS; ERRORS; FAILURES; STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.