Published December 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Is multidetector CT-based bone mineral density and quantitative bone microstructure assessment at the spine still feasible using ultra-low tube current and sparse sampling?

  • 1. Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich (Germany)
  • 2. Research Laboratories, Philips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Hamburg (Germany)
  • 3. Technische Universitaet Muenchen, TUM Institute for Advanced Studies, Garching (Germany)
  • 4. Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Lehrstuhl fuer Biomedizinische Physik, Garching (Germany)
  • 5. Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Section of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Munich (Germany)

Description

Osteoporosis diagnosis using multidetector CT (MDCT) is limited to relatively high radiation exposure. We investigated the effect of simulated ultra-low-dose protocols on in-vivo bone mineral density (BMD) and quantitative trabecular bone assessment. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Twelve subjects with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and 12 age- and gender-matched controls undergoing routine thoracic and abdominal MDCT were included (average effective dose: 10 mSv). Ultra-low radiation examinations were achieved by simulating lower tube currents and sparse samplings at 50%, 25% and 10% of the original dose. BMD and trabecular bone parameters were extracted in T10-L5. Except for BMD measurements in sparse sampling data, absolute values of all parameters derived from ultra-low-dose data were significantly different from those derived from original dose images (p<0.05). BMD, apparent bone fraction and trabecular thickness were still consistently lower in subjects with than in those without fractures (p<0.05). In ultra-low-dose scans, BMD and microstructure parameters were able to differentiate subjects with and without vertebral fractures, suggesting osteoporosis diagnosis is feasible. However, absolute values differed from original values. BMD from sparse sampling appeared to be more robust. This dose-dependency of parameters should be considered for future clinical use. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4904-y

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
27
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 5261-5271
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3