Published August 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

  • 1. Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, P.O. Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC 3122 (Australia)
  • 2. Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO, Space and Astronomy, P.O. Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710 (Australia)
  • 3. Astronomical Observatory, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw (Poland)
  • 4. Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5352 (United States)
  • 5. Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn (Germany)
  • 6. OzGrav: The ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (Australia)
  • 7. CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Insitute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190 (China)

Description

A nanohertz-frequency stochastic gravitational-wave background can potentially be detected through the precise timing of an array of millisecond pulsars. This background produces low-frequency noise in the pulse arrival times that would have a characteristic spectrum common to all pulsars and a well-defined spatial correlation. Recently the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves collaboration (NANOGrav) found evidence for the common-spectrum component in their 12.5 yr data set. Here we report on a search for the background using the second data release of the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array. If we are forced to choose between the two NANOGrav models—one with a common-spectrum process and one without—we find strong support for the common-spectrum process. However, in this paper, we consider the possibility that the analysis suffers from model misspecification. In particular, we present simulated data sets that contain noise with distinctive spectra but show strong evidence for a common-spectrum process under the standard assumptions. The Parkes data show no significant evidence for, or against, the spatially correlated Hellings–Downs signature of the gravitational-wave background. Assuming we did observe the process underlying the spatially uncorrelated component of the background, we infer its amplitude to be A = 2.2 0.3 + 0.4 × 10 15 in units of gravitational-wave strain at a frequency of 1 yr−1. Extensions and combinations of existing and new data sets will improve the prospects of identifying spatial correlations that are necessary to claim a detection of the gravitational-wave background.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac17f4

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Astrophysical Journal Letters
Journal Volume
917
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
[8 p.]
ISSN
2041-8205

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53072110
Subject category
S79: ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
GRAVITATIONAL WAVES; PULSARS; SPECTRA; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES
Descriptors DEC
COSMIC RADIO SOURCES