Modeling and system analysis of fuel cycles for nuclear power sustainability (I): Uranium consumption and waste generation
Creators
Description
Highlights: • Modeling thirteen fuel cycle options based on equilibrium method. • A quantitative and comprehensive comparison. • Focusing on uranium utilization and waste generation. • Advantages of SFR-involved options are explicit. - Abstract: A complete and well-organized nuclear fuel cycle system is the basis for power generation, and therefore a general study on different nuclear fuel cycle options has been performed to explore strategies for the sustainability of nuclear power. Material flows of thirteen fuel cycle options covering the open fuel cycle option, and semi-closed and closed options, have been analyzed to derive a comprehensive comparison using an equilibrium model, and are mainly focused on the consumption of uranium resources and waste generation. Setting once-through cycling (OT) as the basis, spent fuel after interim storage directly sent to geological disposal without further reprocessing, several key data were derived quantitatively, e.g., spent fuel inventory, waste generation (i.e. low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste with short life (LILW-SL), low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste with long life (LILW-LL), high level waste (HLW)), Pu inventory, and the excavation volume of an underground repository. This investigation covers from the front-end of the fuel cycles to the final disposal, which indicates that SFR-involved options show clear advantages in controlling HLW generation with regard to waste amount, decay heat, and activity. Moreover, an option that employs a sodium fast reactor to burn the TRU recovered from the spent fuel of a pressurized water reactor through pyroprocessing shows predominant advantages over other alternatives due to a reduction in the uranium resource consumption, a smaller proliferation-sensitive material inventory, and the least amount of waste generation. The impacts of the conversion ratios on SFR-involved fuel cycles have also been evaluated
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.10.014Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.10.014;
- PII
- S0306-4549(13)00544-6;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Annals of Nuclear Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 65
- Journal Page Range
- p. 10-23
- ISSN
- 0306-4549
- CODEN
- ANENDJ
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46008066
- Subject category
- S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACTINIDE BURNER REACTORS; ENERGY POLICY; FAST REACTORS; FUEL CONSUMPTION; FUEL CYCLE; HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES; INTERMEDIATE-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES; NUCLEAR POWER; PLUTONIUM; PWR TYPE REACTORS; REPROCESSING; SODIUM COOLED REACTORS; SPENT FUELS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; UNDERGROUND DISPOSAL; URANIUM; WASTE STORAGE
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDES; ELEMENTS; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY SOURCES; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; EPITHERMAL REACTORS; FAST REACTORS; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; LIQUID METAL COOLED REACTORS; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS; METALS; NUCLEAR FUELS; POWER; POWER REACTORS; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; REACTOR MATERIALS; REACTORS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; STORAGE; THERMAL REACTORS; TRANSURANIUM ELEMENTS; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTES; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.