The impact of dual- and multi-energy CT on proton pencil beam range uncertainties: a Monte Carlo study
- 1. Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4 (Canada)
- 2. Acoustics and Ionising Radiation Team, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW (United Kingdom)
Description
The purpose of this work is to evaluate the impact of single-, dual- and multi-energy CT (SECT, DECT and MECT) on proton range uncertainties in a patient like geometry and a full Monte Carlo environment. A virtual patient is generated from a real patient pelvis CT scan, where known mass densities and elemental compositions are overwritten in each voxel. Simulated CT images for SECT, DECT and MECT are generated for two limiting cases: (1) theoretical and idealistic CT numbers only affected by Gaussian noise (case A, the best scenario) and (2) reconstructed polyenergetic sinograms containing beam hardening, projection-based Poisson noise, and reconstruction artifacts (case B, the worst scenario). Conversion of the simulated SECT images into Monte Carlo inputs is done following the stoichiometric calibration method. For DECT and MECT, the Bayesian eigentissue decomposition method of Lalonde (2017 Med. Phys. 44 5293–302) is used. Pencil beams from seven different angles around the virtual patient are simulated using TOPAS to assess the performance of each method. Percentage depth doses curves (PDD) are compared to ground truth in order to determine the accuracy of range prediction of each imaging modality. For the idealistic images of case A, MECT and DECT slightly outperforms SECT. Root mean square (RMS) errors or 0.78 mm, 0.49 mm and 0.42 mm on R 80 mm, are observed for SECT, DECT and MECT respectively. In case B, PDD calculated in the MECT derived Monte Carlo inputs generally shows the best agreement with ground truth in both shape and position, with RMS errors of 2.03 mm, 1.38 mm and 0.86 mm for SECT, DECT and MECT respectively. Overall, the Bayesian eigentissue decomposition used with DECT systematically predicts proton ranges more accurately than the gold standard SECT-based approach. When CT numbers are severely affected by imaging artifacts, MECT with four energy bins becomes more reliable than both DECT and SECT. (paper)
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aadf2aAdditional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Journal Volume
- 63
- Journal Issue
- 19
- Journal Page Range
- [12 p.]
- ISSN
- 0031-9155
- CODEN
- PHMBA7
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 52003163
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; GROUND TRUTH MEASUREMENTS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PATIENTS; PROTON BEAMS; SIMULATION
- Descriptors DEC
- BEAMS; CALCULATION METHODS; NUCLEON BEAMS; PARTICLE BEAMS; PROCESSING; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; SPATIAL DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS