Published October 1, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

The impact of dual- and multi-energy CT on proton pencil beam range uncertainties: a Monte Carlo study

  • 1. Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4 (Canada)
  • 2. Acoustics and Ionising Radiation Team, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW (United Kingdom)

Description

The purpose of this work is to evaluate the impact of single-, dual- and multi-energy CT (SECT, DECT and MECT) on proton range uncertainties in a patient like geometry and a full Monte Carlo environment. A virtual patient is generated from a real patient pelvis CT scan, where known mass densities and elemental compositions are overwritten in each voxel. Simulated CT images for SECT, DECT and MECT are generated for two limiting cases: (1) theoretical and idealistic CT numbers only affected by Gaussian noise (case A, the best scenario) and (2) reconstructed polyenergetic sinograms containing beam hardening, projection-based Poisson noise, and reconstruction artifacts (case B, the worst scenario). Conversion of the simulated SECT images into Monte Carlo inputs is done following the stoichiometric calibration method. For DECT and MECT, the Bayesian eigentissue decomposition method of Lalonde (2017 Med. Phys. 44 5293–302) is used. Pencil beams from seven different angles around the virtual patient are simulated using TOPAS to assess the performance of each method. Percentage depth doses curves (PDD) are compared to ground truth in order to determine the accuracy of range prediction of each imaging modality. For the idealistic images of case A, MECT and DECT slightly outperforms SECT. Root mean square (RMS) errors or 0.78 mm, 0.49 mm and 0.42 mm on R 80 mm, are observed for SECT, DECT and MECT respectively. In case B, PDD calculated in the MECT derived Monte Carlo inputs generally shows the best agreement with ground truth in both shape and position, with RMS errors of 2.03 mm, 1.38 mm and 0.86 mm for SECT, DECT and MECT respectively. Overall, the Bayesian eigentissue decomposition used with DECT systematically predicts proton ranges more accurately than the gold standard SECT-based approach. When CT numbers are severely affected by imaging artifacts, MECT with four energy bins becomes more reliable than both DECT and SECT. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aadf2a

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Journal Volume
63
Journal Issue
19
Journal Page Range
[12 p.]
ISSN
0031-9155
CODEN
PHMBA7

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
52003163
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; GROUND TRUTH MEASUREMENTS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PATIENTS; PROTON BEAMS; SIMULATION
Descriptors DEC
BEAMS; CALCULATION METHODS; NUCLEON BEAMS; PARTICLE BEAMS; PROCESSING; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; SPATIAL DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS