Working fluid selection for organic Rankine cycle power generation using hot produced supercritical CO2 from a geothermal reservoir
Creators
- 1. Energy Research Center, Lehigh University, 117 ATLSS Dr., Bethlehem, PA 18015 (United States)
- 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, 19 Memorial Drive West, Bethlehem, PA 18015 (United States)
- 3. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad Michoacán de San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán C.P. 58030 (Mexico)
- 4. Energy Geosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 (United States)
Description
Highlights: • Geothermal heat mining simulations using CO2 as heat extraction fluid were performed. • Working fluid selection criteria for organic Rankine cycle using hot supercritical CO2 were proposed. • Thermal performance of the organic Rankine cycle using hot supercritical CO2 was evaluated. • The suitable working fluids for organic Rankine cycle using hot supercritical CO2 were selected. -- Abstract: Geothermal heat mining simulations using supercritical CO2 (sCO2) were performed in this research. Working fluid selection criteria for power generation using sCO2 from a geothermal reservoir are then presented for subcritical, superheated and supercritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs). Meanwhile, method of working fluid classification for ORC is proposed. To get the most feasible ORC design, this study introduces the concept of "turning point" for isentropic and dry working fluids, as well as minimum turbine inlet temperature for wet working fluids. A thermodynamic model was developed with capabilities to obtain the optimal working fluid mass flow rate, evaporation temperature, superheated temperature, and supercritical pressure, to evaluate the thermal performance of the three ORC approaches using hot produced sCO2. With this model, thirty potential working fluids with critical temperatures in the range from 50 to 225 °C were screened for utilizing hot produced sCO2 considering physical properties, environmental and safety impacts, and thermodynamic performances. Finally, the thermodynamic results were compared for all possible working fluids.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.112Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.112;
- PII
- S1359431118354589;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Applied Thermal Engineering
- Journal Volume
- 149
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1287-1304
- ISSN
- 1359-4311
- CODEN
- ATENFT
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54125134
- Subject category
- S15: GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; CRITICAL TEMPERATURE; EVAPORATION; FLOW RATE; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; HEAT; HEAT EXTRACTION; ISENTROPIC PROCESSES; PERFORMANCE; RANKINE CYCLE; THERMODYNAMIC MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS; TURBINES; WORKING FLUIDS
- Descriptors DEC
- CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCES; EQUIPMENT; FLUIDS; MACHINERY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PARTICLE MODELS; PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODELS; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES; TRANSITION TEMPERATURE; TURBOMACHINERY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.