Published January 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI)

  • 1. Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo (Japan)
  • 2. Centre for Transport Studies, University College London (United Kingdom)

Description

The purpose of this paper is to discuss conceptual requirements for a City Sustainability Index (CSI) and to review existing major sustainability indices/indicators in terms of the requirements. The following indices are reviewed: Ecological Footprint (EF), Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), Dashboard of Sustainability (DS), Welfare Index, Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare, City Development Index, emergy/exergy, Human Development Index (HDI), Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI), Environmental Policy Index (EPI), Living Planet Index (LPI), Environmentally-adjusted Domestic Product (EDP), Genuine Saving (GS), and some applications of composite indices or/and multivariate indicators to local or regional context as case studies. The key conceptual requirements for an adequate CSI are: (i) to consider environmental, economic and social aspects (the triple bottom line of sustainability) from the viewpoint of strong sustainability; (ii) to capture external impacts (leakage effects) of city on other areas beyond the city boundaries particularly in terms of environmental aspects; (iii) to create indices/indicators originally for the purpose of assessing city sustainability; and (iv) to be able to assess world cities in both developed and developing countries using common axes of evaluation. Based on the review, we conclude that it is necessary to create a new CSI that enables us to assess and compare cities' sustainability performance in order to understand the global impact of cities on the environment and human life as compared with their economic contribution. In the future, the CSI will be able to provide local authorities with guidance toward sustainable paths. - Highlights: ► We derive the four key requirements for a new City Sustainability Index (CSI) system. ► First, the triple bottom line must be considered in terms of strong sustainability. ► Second, environmental leakage effects beyond city boundaries should be captured. ► Third, 'city sustainability' should be originally considered when CSI is created. ► Fourth, cities in developed and developing countries can be evaluated without bias.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001;
PII
S0195-9255(11)00075-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Journal Volume
32
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 94-106
ISSN
0195-9255
CODEN
EIARDK

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44019312
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INDEXES; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREAS; URBAN POPULATIONS
Descriptors DEC
DOCUMENT TYPES; EVALUATION; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; HUMAN POPULATIONS; POPULATIONS; RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.