Compressive performance of an arbitrary stiffness matched anatomical Ti64 implant manufactured using Direct Metal Laser Sintering
Creators
- 1. School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Telford Campus, Telford, TF2 9NT (United Kingdom)
Description
Highlights: • A Ti6Al4V tibial implant that mimics the segmented bone anatomy is presented. • The compressive properties of Ti6Al4V cellular anatomical structure was investigated. • Finite Element Analysis was carried out for unit cell selection and performance prediction. • An additively manufactured segmental bone repair implant with Young's modulus slightly lower than bone. The reduction of stress shielding following Segmental Bone Defect (SBD) repair requires stiffness matching strategies. Accordingly, this work introduces a Ti6Al4V (Ti64) SBD tibial implant that mimics the segmented bone anatomy using a digital bio-model derived from X-Ray μCT Scan data. The implant features a sheathed periodic unit cell design that can perform slightly lower than the segmented bone being replaced for potential stiffness matching. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was carried out for the selection of unit cell and to predict the implant performance. The results were then compared to compression test data from a Ti64 Grade 23 implant manufactured using Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) to assess predictability. The outcome of this research shows an anatomical stiffness matched design that maybe suitable for SBD repair of a tibial segment that can be manufactured using DMLS. The developed implant exhibits Young's Modulus (E) of 12.03, 11.94 and 14.58 GPa using Maxwell's criterion, FEA and experimental (highest) methodologies respectively. This is slightly lower than the segmented bone that exhibited 18.01 GPa (ETibia) to allow for stiffness matching following a period of osseointegration depending on 'critical size'. Furthermore, the surface roughness of the implant was found to be favourable for osteoblasts attachment.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.005Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.005;
- PII
- S0264127518308128;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Materials and Design
- Journal Volume
- 160
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1281-1294
- ISSN
- 0264-1275
- CODEN
- MADSD2
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53013023
- Subject category
- S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
- Descriptors DEI
- 3D PRINTING; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CONNECTIVE TISSUE CELLS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IRON ARSENIDES; LASERS; PRESSURE RANGE GIGA PA; SKELETON; X RADIATION
- Descriptors DEC
- ANIMAL CELLS; ARSENIC COMPOUNDS; ARSENIDES; BODY; CALCULATION METHODS; COMPUTER-AIDED FABRICATION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; EVALUATION; FABRICATION; IONIZING RADIATIONS; IRON COMPOUNDS; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; ORGANS; PNICTIDES; PRESSURE RANGE; RADIATIONS; SOMATIC CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY; TRANSITION ELEMENT COMPOUNDS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd.