Published June 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Hybrid MR-PET of brain tumours using amino acid PET and chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI

  • 1. Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Juelich (Germany)
  • 2. UCL Institute of Neurology, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, London (United Kingdom)
  • 3. University College London, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London (United Kingdom)
  • 4. German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Medical Physics in Radiology, Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 5. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn (Germany)
  • 6. Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Cologne (Germany)
  • 7. University of Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne (Germany)
  • 8. RWTH University of Aachen, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aachen (Germany)
  • 9. Juelich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), Section JARA-Brain, Juelich (Germany)
  • 10. RWTH Aachen University, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Aachen (Germany)

Description

PET using radiolabelled amino acids has become a promising tool in the diagnostics of gliomas and brain metastasis. Current research is focused on the evaluation of amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MR imaging for brain tumour imaging. In this hybrid MR-PET study, brain tumours were compared using 3D data derived from APT-CEST MRI and amino acid PET using O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET). Eight patients with gliomas were investigated simultaneously with 18F-FET PET and APT-CEST MRI using a 3-T MR-BrainPET scanner. CEST imaging was based on a steady-state approach using a B1 average power of 1μT. B0 field inhomogeneities were corrected a Prametric images of magnetisation transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) and differences to the extrapolated semi-solid magnetisation transfer reference method, APT and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE), were calculated. Statistical analysis of the tumour-to-brain ratio of the CEST data was performed against PET data using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test. A tumour-to-brain ratio derived from APT and 18F-FET presented no significant differences, and no correlation was found between APT and 18F-FET PET data. The distance between local hot spot APT and 18F-FET were different (average 20 ± 13 mm, range 4-45 mm). For the first time, CEST images were compared with 18F-FET in a simultaneous MR-PET measurement. Imaging findings derived from18F-FET PET and APT CEST MRI seem to provide different biological information. The validation of these imaging findings by histological confirmation is necessary, ideally using stereotactic biopsy. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3940-4

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Journal Volume
45
Journal Issue
6
Journal Page Range
p. 1031-1040
ISSN
1619-7070
CODEN
EJNMA6