Published January 2008 | Version v1
Journal article

Summary of the 8th IAEA Technical Meeting on Fusion Power Plant Safety

  • 1. International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) Safety, Environment and Health Group, ITER Cadarache Joint Work Site, St. Paul Lez Durance (France)
  • 2. European Fusion Development Agreement (EFDA) Close Support Unit (CSU)-Garching, Garching (Germany)
  • 3. Nuclear Fusion Institute, Kurchatov Institute, Moscow (Russian Federation)
  • 4. International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, PO Box 100, A-1400 Vienna (Austria)
  • 5. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
  • 6. EFDA CSU Barcelona-Asociacion EURATOM-CIEMAT, Barcelona (Spain)

Description

Reports were presented covering a selection of topics on the safety of fusion power plants. These included a review on licensing studies developed for ITER site preparation surveying common and non-common issues (i.e. site dependent) as lessons to a broader approach for fusion power plant safety. Several fusion power plant models, spanning from accessible technology to more advanced-materials based concepts, were discussed. On the topic related to fusion-specific technology, safety studies were reported on different concepts of breeding blanket modules, tritium handling and auxiliary systems under normal and accident scenarios' operation. The testing of power plant relevant technology in ITER was also assessed in terms of normal operation and accident scenarios, and occupational doses and radioactive releases under these testings have been determined. Other specific safety issues for fusion have also been discussed such as availability and reliability of fusion power plants, dust and tritium inventories and component failure databases. This study reveals that the environmental impact of fusion power plants can be minimized through a proper selection of low activation materials and using recycling technology helping to reduce waste volume and potentially open the route for its reutilization for the nuclear sector or even its clearance into the commercial circuit. Computational codes for fusion safety have been presented in support of the many studies reported. The on-going work on establishing validation approaches aiming at improving the prediction capability of fusion codes has been supported by experimental results and new directions for development have been identified. Fusion standards are not available and fission experience is mostly used as the framework basis for licensing and target design for safe operation and occupational and environmental constraints. It has been argued that fusion can benefit if a specific fusion approach is implemented, in particular for materials selection which will have a large impact on waste disposal and recycling and in the real limits of radiation releases if indexed to the real impact on individuals and the environment given the differences in the types of radiation emitted by tritium when compared with the fission products. Round table sessions resulted in some common recommendations. The discussions also created the awareness of the need for a larger involvement of the IAEA in support of fusion safety standards development. (conference report)

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1088/0029-5515/48/1/015008;
PII
S0029-5515(08)60366-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Fusion
Journal Volume
48
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 015008
ISSN
0029-5515
CODEN
NUFUAU