Published November 2012 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

Five walls against risk communication of nuclear technology

  • 1. Tokyo Univ., Todai Policy Alternative Research Institute, Tokyo (Japan)

Description

The author has made efforts to establish risk communication in the nuclear industry since the JCO criticality accident. Some people understood the importance and the usefulness of risk communication both for local residents and their own business. Others, however, thought it troublesome, costly, and useless for their organization and nuclear safety. I think, unfortunately, experiences after the Fukushima accident force them to hesitate at communicating risks with the public more and more. I will discuss why and how risk communication of nuclear technology is difficult. (author)

Part of:
Proceedings of the SRA-Japan 25th annual meeting

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Title
Proceedings of the SRA-Japan 25th annual meeting
Imprint Pagination
301 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 231-234

Conference

Title
25. SRA-Japan annual meeting
Dates
9-11 Nov 2012
Place
Hikone, Shiga (Japan)

INIS

Country of Publication
Japan
Country of Input or Organization
Japan
INIS RN
44057979
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
COMMUNICATIONS; CONTAMINATION; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; HUMAN FACTORS; JAPAN; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PUBLIC ANXIETY; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC OPINION; REACTOR ACCIDENTS; RISK ASSESSMENT
Descriptors DEC
ACCIDENTS; ASIA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information