MRI for characterization of primary tumors in the non-cirrhotic liver: Added value of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced hepatospecific phase
Creators
- 1. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich (Switzerland)
- 2. Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Swiss Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich (Switzerland)
- 3. Clinic Hirslanden, Hirslanden Hospital Group, Zurich (Switzerland)
Description
Purpose: To evaluate the added value of hepatospecific phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with primary tumors in non-cirrhotic liver. Methods: Twenty-nine patients (median, 39 years; range, 18–81 years; 11 male) underwent preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI including hepatospecific phase after 10 and 20 min of contrast injection at four institutions in Europe, North America and New Zealand. Images were evaluated by three different readers (R1–R3) who characterized liver tumors with and without consultation of the hepatospecific phase images. Confidence in diagnosis was scored on a visual analog scale from 1 to 10. Histopathology (adenoma, n = 5; focal nodular hyperplasia, n = 11 and hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 13) in all patients served as the standard of reference. Differences were evaluated using the McNemar and Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Without hepatospecific phase images available, 22 (76%), 19 (66%) and 19 (66%) of 29 tumors were characterized correctly by the three readers respectively. Mean confidence in diagnosis was 6.1, 5.7 and 5.8. With the hepatospecific phase included, characterization of liver tumors did not change significantly with 21 (72%), 23 (79%) and 19 (66%) of 29 tumors diagnosed correctly (p > 0.05). According confidence ratings increased to 6.3, 6.5 and 7.7, respectively. Increase in diagnostic confidence was significant for R2 and R3 (p < 0.05) and independent of reader's experience. Conclusion: The additional hepatospecific phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI did not significantly increase diagnostic accuracy in characterization of primary tumors in the non-cirrhotic liver. However, 2/3 readers showed a significant increase in diagnostic confidence after consultation of the hepatospecific phase
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.020Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.020;
- PII
- S0720-048X(14)00158-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Journal of Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 83
- Journal Issue
- 7
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1074-1079
- ISSN
- 0720-048X
- CODEN
- EJRADR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47005452
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; ADENOMAS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS; DTPA; GADOLINIUM COMPLEXES; HEPATOMAS; INJECTION; LIVER; MALES; NEOPLASMS; NMR IMAGING; PATIENTS
- Descriptors DEC
- AMINO ACIDS; BODY; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; CARCINOMAS; CHELATING AGENTS; COMPLEXES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; DRUGS; GLANDS; INTAKE; NEOPLASMS; ORGANIC ACIDS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANS; RADIOPROTECTIVE SUBSTANCES; RARE EARTH COMPLEXES; RESPONSE MODIFYING FACTORS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.