Published 2024 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

Resistive Wall Tearing Mode Major Disruptions with Feedback

  • 1. HRS Fusion, West Orange (United States)
  • 2. University of Wisconsin (United States)

Description

Resistive wall tearing modes (RWTM) are closely related to resistive wall modes (RWMs). RWTMs are tearing modes whose linear and nonlinear growth rate depend on the resistive wall penetration time. The consequence for ITER, with wall penetration time of 250 ms compared to ∼ 5 ms in JET and DIII-D, is that the thermal quench timescale could be much longer than previously conjectured. Active feedback is another possible way to mitigate or prevent RWTM disruptions. Simulations indicate that feedback can make the resistive wall behave effectively as an ideal wall, preventing major disruptions. Linear MHD simulations and theory [1,2] show that the RWTM growth time is asymptotically proportional to the wall penetration time, like a RWM. The q = 2 mode rational surface must be sufficiently close to the wall for a RWTM disruption to occur. This agrees quantitatively with a DIII-D locked mode disruption database [3], in which disruptions require the q = 2 rational surface radius to exceed 0.75 of the plasma minor radius. A nonlinear MHD simulation of a DIII-D locked mode equilibrium reconstruction shows a complete thermal quench in a time which agrees with experiment. The Madison Symmetric Tokamak (MST) has a longer resistive wall time (800 ms) than ITER, and disruptions are not observed experimentally when MST is operated as a standard tokamak. Simulations indicate that the RWTM disruption time scale is longer than the experimental shot time. A sequence of low edge current model equilibria [4,5] was produced from MST equilibrium reconstructions, with higher edge q and with wall distance 1.2 times the wall radius, similar to DIII-D. Nonlinear simulations showed that only minor disruptions occur with an ideal wall. Major disruptions occur only for a resistive wall, and with edge q ≤ 3.4. This requires that the q = 2 minor radius is greater than 0.77 of the plasma radius, as in the DIII-D database [3]. Simulations with resistive wall and feedback [5] are similar to an ideal wall. An ideal wall or resistive wall with feedback, restricts the modes to moderate amplitude, producing only a minor disruption. With the same initial equilibrium and no feedback the mode amplitude is large, causing a major disruption. The feedback simulations are consistent with the findings of an experiment in RFX - mod [6], in which feedback was applied to stabilize equilibria with edge q > 2.

Part of:
Third Technical Meeting on Plasma Disruptions and their Mitigation. Presentations

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Title
Third Technical Meeting on Plasma Disruptions and their Mitigation. Presentations
Imprint Pagination
vp.
Journal Page Range
vp.
Report number
INIS-XA--24M3135

Conference

Title
3. Technical Meeting on Plasma Disruptions and their Mitigation
Dates
3-6 Sep 2024
Place
St Paul Lez Durance Cedex, France

INIS

Country of Publication
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55090942
Subject category
S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
DOUBLET-3 DEVICE; ITER TOKAMAK; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; MODE RATIONAL SURFACES; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS; TEARING INSTABILITY
Descriptors DEC
CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; FLUID MECHANICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INSTABILITY; MAGNETIC FIELD CONFIGURATIONS; MAGNETIC SURFACES; MECHANICS; PLASMA INSTABILITY; PLASMA MACROINSTABILITIES; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS; TOKAMAK DEVICES; TOKAMAK TYPE REACTORS

Optional Information

Notes
6 refs. Imprint:Refs.