Published July 1, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Quantifying the dosimetric impact of organ-at-risk delineation variability in head and neck radiation therapy in the context of patient setup uncertainty

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (United States)

Description

The purpose of this study was to quantify the potential dosimetric impact of delineation variability (DV) in head and neck radiation therapy (RT) when inherent patient setup variability (SV) is also considered.

The impact of DV was assessed by generating plans with multiple structure sets, cross-evaluating them, including SV, across sets, and determining P PQM: the probability of achieving organ-specific plan quality metrics (PQM). DV was incorporated by: (1) using multiple organ at risk (OAR) structure sets delineated by independent manual observers; and (2) randomly perturbing manually generated OARs to generate alternatives with varying levels of uncertainty (low, medium, and high DV). For each structure set, independent VMAT plans were auto-generated to meet clinical PQMs. Each plan was cross-evaluated using OARs from multiple structure sets with simulated SV including per-fraction random (σ s) and per-treatment-course systematic (Σs) setup errors. The dosimetric impact of DV was assessed by examining P PQM with and without SV/DV. Clinically significant differences were defined by those that exceeded differences caused by a  +2% output variation.

Without including SV, simulated DV at the medium level reduced P PQM by an average of 5.5% for all OARs with D max PQMs. This reduction decreased to 2.8% for SV  =  2 mm and 2.4% for SV  =  4 mm (the average P PQM reduction due to 2% output errors was 2.7%). For OARs with D mean PQMs, the average P PQM reduction was 0.9% for SV  =  0 and  ⩽0.1% for SV  ⩾  2 mm. The effect of DV was larger for OARs that directly abutted a target volume than for those that did not. These trends were also observed with real DV from multi-observer delineations.

The dosimetric impact of DV appeared to decrease when random and systematic SV was considered. Sensitivity to DV was affected by OAR objective type (i.e. D mean versus D max objectives) as well as distance from the target volume. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab205c

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Journal Volume
64
Journal Issue
13
Journal Page Range
[14 p.]
ISSN
0031-9155
CODEN
PHMBA7

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
52003921
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
DOSIMETRY; HEAD; NECK; PATIENTS; RADIATION HAZARDS; RADIOSENSITIVITY; RADIOTHERAPY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; HAZARDS; HEALTH HAZARDS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY; THERAPY