Published November 1, 2004 | Version v1
Journal article

Relating incomplete data and incomplete theory

  • 1. Laboratoire de Physique Theorique, Universite Paris-Sud, F-91405 Orsay, France and APC, Universite Paris 7, College de France, F-75231 Paris (France)
  • 2. Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics, Randall Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Physics, David Rittenhouse Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 (United States)
  • 4. Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (United States)

Description

Assuming string theorists will not soon provide a compelling case for the primary theory underlying particle physics, the field will proceed as it has historically: with data stimulating and testing ideas. Ideally the soft supersymmetry breaking Lagrangian will be measured and its patterns will point to the underlying theory. But there are two new problems. First a matter of principle: the theory may be simplest at distance scales and in numbers of dimensions where direct experiments are not possible. Second a practical problem: in the foreseeable future (with mainly hadron collider data) too few observables can be measured to lead to direct connections between experiment and theory. In this paper we discuss and study these issues and consider ways to circumvent the problems, studying models to test methods. We propose a semiquantitative method for focusing and sharpening thinking when trying to relate incomplete data to incomplete theory, as will probably be necessary

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physical Review. D, Particles Fields
Journal Volume
70
Journal Issue
9
Journal Page Range
p. 095006-095006.21
ISSN
0556-2821
CODEN
PRVDAQ

INIS

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2004 The American Physical Society