Published April 1, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

A comparison of emissive and cold floating probe techniques for electric potential measurements in rf inductive discharge

  • 1. Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 125412, Izhorskaya 13, Bd 2, Moscow (Russian Federation)

Description

A cold floating probe method was compared with the emissive floating probe method in terms of a low-pressure radio-frequency inductive discharge. The dependences of difference between the plasma potential and the floating potential on the electron temperature 1–8 eV, plasma density 109–1012 cm−3 and magnetic field 100–650 G were obtained. It was demonstrated that the difference between the potentials that obtained by these two methods can differ significantly from the expected value of 5.2 kT e/e for argon. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2058-6272/aaf250

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Plasma Science and Technology
Journal Volume
21
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
[5 p.]
ISSN
1009-0630

INIS

Country of Publication
China
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
51067843
Subject category
S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
Descriptors DEI
ARGON; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ELECTRON TEMPERATURE; MAGNETIC FIELDS; PLASMA DENSITY; PLASMA POTENTIAL; RADIOWAVE RADIATION
Descriptors DEC
ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; ELEMENTS; EVALUATION; FLUIDS; GASES; NONMETALS; RADIATIONS; RARE GASES