Published 2023 | Version v1
Journal article

The effect of contrast media on CT measures of bone mineral density: a systematic review

  • 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Split-Dalmatia County Health Center, Kavanjinova 2, 21000, Split (Croatia)
  • 2. Clinical Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Split, Šoltanska 2, 21000, Split (Croatia)
  • 3. University Department of Health Studies, University of Split, Ruđera Boškovića 35, 21000, Split (Croatia)
  • 4. School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska 2, 21000, Split (Croatia)

Description

The aim was to systematically assess the literature on possible effect of administration of iodinated contrast media on CT-estimated bone mineral density (BMD). The Web of Science and PubMed databases were searched. Studies that used both CT principles of BMD measurement (volumetric quantitative BMD and CT attenuation in Hounsfield Units) were included. The baseline patient data, skeletal site, contrast medium data (if reported), and change in BMD on contrast-enhanced CT scans were collected. Sixteen studies met our review criteria, the majority of which was performed on lumbar spine, and the others on proximal femur. Almost all studies reported a significant increase in BMD values on the contrast-enhanced CT scans, ranging from 0.8 to 30.3%. The increase was most frequently reported to be about 10 to 15% for the spine and 5 to 10% for the femur. In addition to the difference in skeletal site, some authors found the contrast effect was age-, sex-, and contrast dose-dependent. BMD values in arterial phase were generally somewhat lower than in venous phase, and the effect of contrast in venous phase was more predictable. The review revealed significant changes in BMD values between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT. The change was more pronounced in lumbar spine than in proximal femur and appeared to depend on age, sex, contrast dose, and postcontrast imaging protocol. The review suggests the understanding of all mentioned factors during the interpretation of BMD measured on contrast-enhanced CT.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04222-2

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Skeletal Radiology
Journal Volume
52
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 687-694
ISSN
0364-2348
CODEN
SKRADI