Published March 1, 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Randomized Phase 2 Trial of S1 and Oxaliplatin-Based Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Induction Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

  • 1. Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 4. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 5. Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 6. Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 7. Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 8. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

Description

Purpose: To assess, in a randomized, phase 2 trial, the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy (ICT) of S1 and oxaliplatin for esophageal cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage II, III, or IVA esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to either 2 cycles of ICT (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and S1 at 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (46 Gy, 2 Gy/d with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on days 1 and 21 and S1 30 mg/m2 twice daily, 5 days per week during radiation therapy) and esophagectomy (arm A), or the same CCRT followed by esophagectomy without ICT (arm B). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results: A total of 97 patients were randomized (arm A/B, 47/50), 70 of whom underwent esophagectomy (arm A/B, 34/36). The intention-to-treat pCR rate was 23.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2-35.6%) in arm A and 38% (95% CI 24.5% to 51.5%) in arm B. With a median follow-up duration of 30.3 months, the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 58.4% in arm A and 58.6% in arm B, whereas the 2-year overall survival rate was 60.7% and 63.7%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia during CCRT was more common in arm A than in arm B (35.4% vs 4.1%). The relative dose intensity of S1 (89.5% ± 20.6% vs 98.3% ± 5.2%, P=.005) and oxaliplatin (91.4% ± 16.8% vs 99.0% ± 4.2%, P=.007) during CCRT was lower in arm A compared with arm B. Three patients in arm A, compared with none in arm B, died within 90 days after surgery. Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy of S1 and oxaliplatin is an effective chemoradiotherapy regimen to treat esophageal cancer. However, we failed to show that the addition of ICT to the regimen can improve the pCR rate

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.019

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.019;
PII
S0360-3016(14)04400-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
91
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 489-496
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47028193
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CHEMOTHERAPY; COMBINED THERAPY; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ESOPHAGUS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY; RANDOMNESS; SAFETY; SURGERY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; DOSES; EVALUATION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.