Published September 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

F-18-Fludarabine PET for Lymphoma Imaging: First-in-Humans Study on DLBCL and CLL Patients

  • 1. CHU Caen, Inst Hematol, Caen, (France)
  • 2. Univ Caen Normandie, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT LDM TEP Grp,GIP Cyceron, Caen, (France)
  • 3. CHU Caen, Dept Radiol, Caen, (France)
  • 4. CHU Nantes, Dept Nucl Med, Nantes, (France)
  • 5. Ctr Francois Baclesse, Inst Hematol, Caen, (France)
  • 6. CHU Caen, Dept Nucl Med, Caen, (France)
  • 7. Univ Rouen Normandie, INSERM, U1245, Rouen, (France)
  • 8. Univ Caen Normandie, Microenvironm et Canc Hematol MICAH, Caen, (France)

Description

This was the first-in-humans clinical study of F-18-fludarabine, which is a radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging in lymphoma, for which many issues remain controversial with the standard radiotracer F-18-FDG. Methods: F-18-fludarabine PET or PET/CT was performed on 10 patients: 5 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 5 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The tumor uptake, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry of F-18-fludarabine were evaluated. Six successive partial-body PET scans were acquired for 250 min after an intravenous 4 MBq/kg bolus of F-18-fludarabine. SUVs were recorded for each involved lymph node territory and for several extranodal sites, with particular reference to the liver. To assess the time-related uptake profile of F-18-fludarabine, PET images were analyzed by delineating volumes of interest over the uptake sites on the optimal scan for visual observation and were projected onto all coregistered scans of the same subject. Physical examination, laboratory studies, and contrast-enhanced CT were performed on all patients. For the DLBCL group, F-18-FDG PET was also considered. Results: In DLBCL patients, increased F-18-fludarabine uptake was observed in sites considered abnormal by CT or F-18-FDG, with SUVs significantly higher in involved lesions than in physiologic nontarget sites. Nonetheless, the comparison of F-18-fludarabine and F-18-FDG PET showed discrepancies in 2 patients. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, the uptake of F-18-fludarabine coincided with sites expected to be involved (including splenic invasion) according to conventional clinical and CT staging and was significant in hematopoietic bone marrow. No uptake was observed, whatever the disease group, in cardiac muscle or brain. The mean effective dose from a mean injected F-18-fludarabine activity of 305 #+-# 76 MBq was 3.07 #+-# 0.81 mSv. Conclusion: F-18-fludarabine PET might well be a promising tool for lymphoproliferative diseases. The radiation dose of this radiopharmaceutical is below that of F-18-FDG. The specificity of this PET probe for lymphoid cells, its absence of accumulation in reactive tissues, and its feasibility for detection of bone marrow infiltration might play an innovative role in lymphoma imaging. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.206920

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Journal Volume
59
Journal Issue
no.9
Journal Page Range
p. 1380-1385
ISSN
0161-5505