Published August 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Bayesian parameterisation of a regional photovoltaic model – Application to forecasting

  • 1. MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, O.I.E. Centre Observation, Impacts, Energy, 06904 Sophia Antipolis (France)
  • 2. Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy Systen Technology (IEE), 34119 Kassel (Germany)
  • 3. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (ISE), 79110 Freiburg (Germany)
  • 4. Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, 2601 Canberra (Australia)
  • 5. Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), Offenbach (Germany)

Description

Estimating and forecasting photovoltaic (PV) power generation in regions—e.g. the area controlled by the transmission system operator (TSO)—is a requirement for the operation of the electricity supply system. An accurate calculation of this quantity requires detailed information of the installed PV systems within the considered region; however, this information is not publicly available making forecasting difficult. Therefore, approximating the undefined PV systems information for use in a PV power model (parameterization) is of critical interest. In this paper, we propose a methodological approach for parameterization using time series of aggregated PV power generation. A Bayesian approach is used to overcome the significant number of unknown parameters in the problem. It regularizes the linear system by imposing constraints on deviations from an initial-guess and covariance matrices; the initial guess uses available statistical distributions of PV system metadata. The performance of the proposed forecasting approach is evaluated using estimates of the regional PV power generation from three TSOs and meteorological data from the IFS forecast model (ECMWF). The proposed forecasting approach without the Bayesian parameterization has RMSE of 3.90%, 4.25% and 4.64%, respectively; including the Bayesian approach gives RMSE of 3.82%, 4.23% and 4.51%. For comparison, we also deployed a multiple linear regression which gave RMSE of 3.89%, 4.12% and 4.54%; however, there are considerable downsides to such an approach. Our approach is competitive with TSO forecasting systems despite using far fewer input data and simpler implementation of NWP prediction. This is particularly promising as there are many avenues for future development.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.053;
PII
S0038092X19306279;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Solar Energy
Journal Volume
188
Journal Page Range
p. 760-774
ISSN
0038-092X

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55093468
Subject category
S14: SOLAR ENERGY;
Descriptors DEI
APPROXIMATIONS; ELECTRICITY; FORECASTING; IMPLEMENTATION; LIMITING VALUES; METEOROLOGY; PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECT; POWER GENERATION; SOLAR CELLS
Descriptors DEC
CALCULATION METHODS; DIRECT ENERGY CONVERTERS; EQUIPMENT; PHOTOELECTRIC CELLS; PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; SOLAR EQUIPMENT

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 International Solar Energy Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.