Published October 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

What is the deal with the Green Deal: Will the new strategy help to improve European freshwater quality beyond the Water Framework Directive?

  • 1. Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala (Sweden)
  • 2. School of Natural Sciences, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW (United Kingdom)
  • 3. Forschungszentrum Jülich IBG-3, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich (Germany)
  • 4. The James Hutton Institute, Environmental and Biochemical Sciences Group, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • Green Deal focuses on reducing primary sources of agricultural diffuse pollution. • Green Deal complements the Water Framework Directive focus on ecological impacts. • However, expected reductions in nutrient losses by 2030 might not be achievable. • A better integration of the EU's strategies and scientific evidence is needed. • Pollution continuum framework can help to improve European freshwater quality Agricultural land use covers almost half of the EU territory and reducing nutrient and pesticide losses to freshwaters is central to existing EU policy. However, the progress of improving freshwater quality and reducing eutrophication is slow and lags behind targets. The Green Deal is a key element of the EU plans to implement the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. Here, we discuss the opportunities that the Green Deal and associated strategies may provide for the achievement of the water quality goals of the Water Framework Directive in agricultural landscapes. We welcome Green Deal's aspirational stated goals. However, the reliance of mitigation of diffuse agricultural pollution on the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy represents grave risks for practical implementation and the achievement of the Green Deal objectives. We also argue that the new strategies should be targeted at tackling and understanding the sources of water quality problems along the full pollution continuum. To maximise the opportunities for tackling diffuse pollution from agricultural land use and achieving the delayed water quality targets, we stress that a range of targeted new instruments will be needed to close the gaps in the pollution continuum 'from source to impact'. These gaps include: (I) smart and standardised monitoring of the impacts of proposed eco-schemes and agri-environment-climate measures, (ii) active restoration of agricultural streams and ditches and their floodplains to reduce secondary pollution sources, (iii) options to draw down nutrient levels to or below the agronomic optimum that reduce legacy sources, (iv) integrating farm-scale and catchment-scale analysis of trade-offs in reducing different pollutants and their combined effects, and finally (v) accounting for emerging pressures to freshwater quality due to climate change. Incorporation of the pollution continuum framework into tackling diffuse agricultural pollution will ensure that the European water-related policy goals are achieved.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148080

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148080;
PII
S004896972103151X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
791
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.